When there is a war or crisis in Africa, Asia, or Latin America, most people read about it in Western newspapers. These papers are from Europe or North America. They have a lot of money and power. But their stories often miss important parts. They might leave out history. They might only talk to leaders, not normal people. This commentary gives readers five simple questions to ask when they read these stories. These questions help us see the full picture. They help us understand the pain and the truth of the Global South. This is not about hating Western media. It is about reading with open eyes.
Introduction: The Story We See
Turn on the television. Open a news app. You see a headline: “Violence Erupts in Sudan” or “Crisis in Yemen.”[1] The story talks about bombs, numbers of dead, and big political leaders. It feels urgent. It feels serious.
But something is missing. You do not hear the voices of mothers who lost children. You do not hear about the history of why the fighting started. You do not hear about the people who are trying to build peace.[2]
Western media is powerful. It shapes how the world sees problems. But it often sees the Global South through a narrow lens. It sees victims, not survivors. It sees chaos, not complexity.[3] As readers, we do not have to accept every story as the full truth. We can learn to read between the lines.
This commentary offers five simple questions. Use them when you read about conflicts in the Global South. They will help you find the missing pieces.
Question 1: Who Is Speaking?
The first thing to check is the source. Who is giving the information?[4]
In many Western reports, the sources are officials. They are generals, politicians, or experts from big universities in the West. They speak in formal language. They talk about strategy and borders.
But where are the local people? Where are the teachers, the shopkeepers, the farmers?[5] They are the ones living through the conflict. They know what is really happening. If a story only quotes officials, it is only half a story.
What to do: Look for names of local people. If you do not see them, know that the story is incomplete. Search for local news sites to hear their side.
Question 2: Where Is the Reporter?
Location matters. Is the reporter standing in the capital city? Or are they in the village where the fighting is?[6]
Many Western news agencies have offices in big cities like London or New York. They send reporters to the Global South only when there is big violence. They stay in safe hotels. They do not walk the streets.[7]
This creates a distance. The story feels cold. It feels like a video game, not real life. A reporter who lives in the region understands the culture. They know the language. They know the fear.
What to do: Check the byline. Where is the writer based? If they are flying in for two days, take their story with a grain of salt. Look for reports from journalists who live there.
Question 3: What Is the History?
Conflicts do not start overnight. They have roots.[8] But Western media often treats them like sudden storms. They say, “Violence broke out today.” This makes it seem random. It makes the people seem naturally violent.
This is not true. Most conflicts have a long history. Maybe there was a war ten years ago. Maybe there was colonial rule fifty years ago. Maybe there is a fight over water or land.[9]
When history is missing, the blame falls on the wrong people. It looks like one group is just “bad.” But usually, both sides have grievances.
What to do: Ask yourself: “What happened before this?” If the article does not say, look for a background piece. Do not judge the present without knowing the past.
Question 4: Who Is the Victim?
How are the people shown in the pictures? Are they shown as helpless victims?[10]
Western media loves images of suffering. They show crying children or ruined homes. This makes people feel sad. It makes them donate money. But it also takes away power. It makes the locals look like they cannot help themselves.[11]
It ignores the people who are feeding their neighbors. It ignores the doctors working without electricity. It ignores the activists demanding change. These people are not just victims. They are agents of change.
What to do: Look for stories of strength, not just pain. Who is solving the problem? If everyone looks helpless, the story is biased.
Question 5: What Is the Solution?
Finally, look at the ending. Does the story suggest a solution?[12]
Often, Western media suggests that outside help is the only answer. They say, “The UN must step in” or “Western countries should send aid.” This implies that locals cannot fix their own problems.[13]
But local communities often have their own ways to make peace. They have elders, councils, and traditions. These are often ignored by international planners.[14]
What to do: Ask: “Who is fixing this?” If the only heroes are foreigners, the story is incomplete. Real peace comes from within.
Why This Matters
You might ask: “Why does this matter? I just want to know the news.”
It matters because stories shape policy. When Western leaders read these stories, they make decisions. They send weapons. They send aid. They impose sanctions.[15] If the stories are wrong, the decisions are wrong.
It also matters for dignity. People in the Global South are tired of being seen as problems. They want to be seen as partners. They want to be heard.[16]
As readers, we have power. When we ask these five questions, we demand better journalism. We tell editors that we want the full truth. We support the idea of knowledge “Beyond Western Frames.”
Conclusion: Be a Smart Reader
You do not need to be an expert to read critically. You just need to be curious.
Next time you read a headline about a conflict in the Global South, pause. Ask the five questions:
Who is speaking?
Where is the reporter?
What is the history?
Who is the victim?
What is the solution?
If the answers are missing, do not stop there. Search for local voices. Read regional newspapers. Listen to community radio. The truth is not just in the big Western papers. It is in the streets, the villages, and the voices of the people. By seeking them out, we honor their humanity. We build a world where everyone’s knowledge counts.
[1] Edward Said, Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine How We See the Rest of the World (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981), 3.
[2] Chinua Achebe, “An Image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s Heart of Darkness,” Massachusetts Review 18, no. 4 (1977): 782.
[3] Teun A. van Dijk, News as Discourse (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988), 55.
[4] Howard Friel and Richard Falk, The Israel-Palestine Conflict: One Hundred Years of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 12.
[5] Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988), 271.
[6] Mark Pedelty, War Stories: The Culture of Foreign Correspondents (New York: Routledge, 1995), 89.
[7] Susan Moeller, Compassion Fatigue: How the Media Sell Disease, Famine, War and Death (New York: Routledge, 1999), 45.
[8] Mahmood Mamdani, Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror (New York: Pantheon, 2004), 15.
[9] Pankaj Mishra, From the Ruins of Empire: The Intellectuals Who Remade Asia (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2012), 20.
[10] Lila Abu-Lughod, “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others,” American Anthropologist 104, no. 3 (2002): 785.
[11] Teju Cole, “The White-Savior Industrial Complex,” The Atlantic, March 21, 2012, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/the-white-savior-industrial-complex/254843.
[12] Roland Marchand, Creating the Third Force: Indigenous Processes of Peacemaking (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013), 5.
[13] James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998), 340.
[14] John Paul Lederach, The Moral Imagination: The Art and Soul of Building Peace (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), 60.
[15] Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (New York: Pantheon, 1988), 2.
[16] Boaventura de Sousa Santos, The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South (Durham: Duke University Press, 2018), 10.
Climate change is a serious problem for everyone. Scientists use computer models to predict weather and plan for the future. These models are powerful tools. But often, they forget one important thing: the people who live on the land. Farmers, fishers, and villagers know their environment very well. They have watched the rain, the rivers, and the soil for many years. This commentary asks: What happens when climate models ignore this local knowledge? It argues that ignoring local voices leads to bad plans, wasted money, and more danger for poor communities. To fix this, we must mix scientific data with local wisdom. This is not just about better science. It is about respect and justice.
Introduction: The Farmer and the Satellite
Imagine a farmer in Punjab. He has grown wheat on the same land for forty years. He knows when the rain will come by watching the clouds. He knows how the river behaves by looking at the mud on the banks. He does not use a computer. But he has data. His data is in his memory and his experience.[1]
Now imagine a scientist in a big office far away. She uses satellites and supercomputers. She makes maps showing where floods will happen. Her maps look very precise. They have many colors and numbers. But sometimes, her maps do not match what the farmer sees.[2]
This is a common problem today. Global climate models are built mostly in rich countries. They use big data. But they often miss small, local details. When plans are made using only these models, local people suffer. This commentary explores why this happens and how we can fix it.
What Are Climate Models?
Climate models are like computer simulations. They try to copy how the earth works. They use math to guess what will happen to temperature, rain, and sea levels.[3] These models are very important. Governments use them to build dams, plan cities, and prepare for disasters.
But models are not perfect. They need information to work. If the information is wrong or missing, the guess will be wrong. In many parts of the Global South, like Pakistan, there are not enough weather stations.[4] So, scientists fill the gaps with estimates. These estimates might be correct for a large region, but wrong for a specific village.
What Is Local Knowledge?
Local knowledge is different from computer data. It is not written in numbers. It is passed down from parents to children. It is based on watching nature closely over a long time.[5]
For example, fishers in the Indus Delta know which fish come when the water is salty. They know which trees grow where the soil is wet. This knowledge helps them survive. It is not just tradition. It is practical science.[6]
Western science often calls this “anecdotal” or “informal.” This means they think it is not serious. But for the people living there, this knowledge is real. It works. Ignoring it is like trying to drive a car with only one eye closed.
The Cost of Ignoring Local Voices
When planners ignore local knowledge, things can go wrong. Here are three main problems:
1. Failed Projects Sometimes, big organizations build things to help people. They might build a flood wall or a new irrigation canal. They design it using computer models. But if they do not ask the locals, they might build it in the wrong place. The wall might block a path people use. The canal might dry up in summer because the model did not know about local water use.[7] This wastes money. It also makes people lose trust in helpers.
2. Wrong Warnings Early warning systems are meant to save lives. They tell people when a storm is coming. But if the warning is too general, people might not listen. If a model says, “flood risk in District X,” but the village knows the water never reaches them, they will not move.[8] When the flood comes unexpectedly, lives are lost. Local knowledge can make warnings specific and trustworthy.
3. Loss of Trust When outside experts come and tell locals what to do, it feels rude. It feels like the experts think they know everything. This creates anger. People stop cooperating. For climate plans to work, people must agree to them. If they feel unheard, they will not follow the rules.[9]
A Case from Pakistan: The 2022 Floods
The 2022 floods in Pakistan were a disaster. Millions of people were affected. Many reports say the rain was heavier than models predicted.[10] But local communities had signs. They saw the rivers rising faster than usual. They saw the clouds behaving strangely.
In some villages, people moved to higher ground before the official warning came. They used their own judgment. In other places, people waited for the government message. When the message came late, they were trapped.[11]
This shows the gap. The big models missed the local intensity. The local knowledge was there, but it was not part of the official plan. If the two had been combined, more lives could have been saved.
Why Do Models Ignore Local Knowledge?
There are a few reasons for this gap.
First, it is about power. Big science institutions have money and influence. Local communities often do not. It is easier for a minister to listen to a computer report than to talk to hundreds of farmers.[12]
Second, it is about language. Scientists speak in technical terms. Farmers speak in local languages. There is no easy way to translate “soil moisture levels” into “the ground feels dry.” So, the knowledge gets lost in translation.[13]
Third, it is about time. Building a model takes months. Talking to communities takes time too. Planners are often in a hurry. They choose the fast option.[14]
A Better Way: Mixing Science and Wisdom
We do not need to choose between computers and communities. We need both. This is called “co-production” of knowledge. It means scientists and locals work together from the start.[15]
Here is how it can work:
1. Listen First Before making a plan, experts should sit with the community. They should ask: “What changes have you seen?” “Where does the water go?” “What worked before?” This takes time, but it saves trouble later.
2. Simple Tools Scientists can make tools that locals can use. For example, a simple rain gauge that anyone can read. Or a phone message system that uses local language. This bridges the gap.[16]
3. Respect Local Experts Farmers and elders should be treated as experts. They should be invited to planning meetings. Their names should be on the reports. This gives them respect and ownership.[17]
4. Check the Models Locals can help check if the computer maps are right. They can say, “This map says flood, but this land is high.” This helps scientists fix their models.[18]
Conclusion: Justice in Climate Action
Climate change is not just a scientific problem. It is a human problem. The people who suffer the most are often the ones who did the least to cause it. They are the poor, the farmers, the villagers.[19]
When we ignore their knowledge, we add to their pain. We treat them like objects, not partners. This is not right.
To build a safe future, we need all kinds of knowledge. We need the satellite. And we need the farmer. We need the computer. And we need the memory.
Presser Review believes in knowledge “Beyond Western Frames.” This means we value different ways of knowing. It means we respect the South as much as the North. It means we listen to the people on the ground. If we do this, our climate plans will be stronger. They will be cheaper. And most importantly, they will be fair.
[1] Daniel R. Headrick, When Knowledge Failed: Lessons from History (London: Oxford University Press, 2020), 45.
Food security remains a critical issue in Pakistan, where a growing population, climate variability, and socio-economic disparities exacerbate vulnerabilities in food availability, access, and utilization. This systematic literature review examines the multifaceted challenges, policy responses, and future directions for achieving sustainable food security in the country. We synthesize existing research to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current food security landscape, focusing on key dimensions such as climate change impacts, policy frameworks, production systems, and the water-energy-food nexus. The review identifies significant gaps in policy implementation, particularly in addressing regional disparities and adapting to climate-induced shocks, while also highlighting the role of global food market dynamics in shaping domestic food security. Methodologically, we adopt a rigorous approach to select and analyze relevant studies, ensuring a balanced representation of diverse perspectives and empirical evidence. Our findings reveal that while Pakistan has made progress in formulating food security strategies, structural inefficiencies, resource constraints, and governance challenges hinder their effectiveness. The review underscores the need for integrated policies that prioritize climate resilience, equitable resource distribution, and technological innovation in agriculture. By consolidating insights from existing literature, this study offers actionable recommendations for policymakers and researchers to address persistent food insecurity and align future efforts with sustainable development goals. The conclusions emphasize the urgency of interdisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based decision-making to mitigate food security risks in Pakistan.
Food security, defined as the consistent availability, accessibility, and utilization of sufficient and nutritious food, remains a pressing challenge for Pakistan, a country grappling with rapid population growth, environmental stressors, and socio-economic inequalities.[1] As the fifth most populous nation globally, Pakistan faces a dual burden of undernutrition and rising food inflation, with nearly 40% of its population experiencing moderate or severe food insecurity.[2] The agrarian economy, which contributes 19% to the GDP and employs 38% of the labor force, is increasingly vulnerable to climate shocks, water scarcity, and outdated farming practices.[3] These systemic vulnerabilities are compounded by fragmented policy frameworks and inadequate infrastructure, raising concerns about the countryโs ability to meet Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2โzero hungerโby 2030.[4]
The historical context of food security in Pakistan reveals cyclical patterns of progress and regression. The Green Revolution of the 1960s initially boosted crop yields through high-yielding varieties and irrigation expansion, but gains were unevenly distributed across regions and socio-economic groups.[5] Subsequent decades saw declining agricultural productivity due to soil degradation, inefficient water management, and underinvestment in rural development.[6] Meanwhile, urbanization and dietary shifts have intensified demand for diverse food commodities, straining domestic production systems and increasing reliance on food imports.[7] Climate change exacerbates these challenges, with rising temperatures, erratic monsoon patterns, and glacial melt in the Himalayas threatening the viability of staple crops like wheat and rice.[8]
Despite extensive research on Pakistanโs food security, critical gaps persist in the literature. First, most studies focus narrowly on production deficits or macroeconomic policies, overlooking the interconnectedness of water, energy, and food systems.[9] Second, there is limited synthesis of how global crisesโsuch as the COVID-19 pandemic or geopolitical conflictsโdisrupt local food supply chains and exacerbate household-level insecurity.[10] Third, while policy evaluations exist, few critically assess the implementation gaps between federal initiatives and ground-level outcomes, particularly for marginalized communities.[11] Finally, the role of emerging technologies (e.g., precision agriculture, digital marketplaces) in mitigating food insecurity remains underexplored in the Pakistani context.[12]
This review is motivated by the urgent need to consolidate fragmented knowledge and identify pathways for transformative action. By systematically analyzing trends, policies, and challenges, we aim to provide a holistic understanding of food security dynamics in Pakistan, bridging disciplinary divides between agronomy, economics, and climate science. Our contribution lies in synthesizing evidence across scalesโfrom farm-level adaptations to national strategiesโwhile highlighting the interdependencies between environmental, socio-political, and technological factors. The findings are intended to inform policymakers, researchers, and development practitioners seeking to address systemic vulnerabilities and align interventions with the principles of sustainability and equity.
This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to ensure methodological rigor and transparency.[13] We conducted searches across nine databases, prioritizing discipline-specific repositories to capture diverse perspectives. Scopus and Web of Science were selected for their comprehensive coverage of peer-reviewed journals in agricultural and environmental sciences, while PubMed provided access to health-related dimensions of food security. IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library were included to identify technological innovations in food systems. ScienceDirect and SpringerLink supplemented these with interdisciplinary publications, and arXiv was searched for preprints on emerging topics. Google Scholar served as a supplementary tool to verify the completeness of our search.
The search strings combined keywords related to food security (โFood Securityโ), geographic focus (โPakistanโ OR โPakโ OR โPKโ), and thematic elements (โChallengesโ OR โObstaclesโ OR โHurdlesโ), (โPoliciesโ OR โStrategiesโ), and (โFuture Directionsโ OR โFuture Plansโ). Boolean operators and field-specific syntax (e.g., TIAB for PubMed, TITLE-ABS-KEY for Scopus) were tailored to each database. To minimize bias, we excluded review articles, surveys, and meta-analyses, focusing instead on primary research and empirical studies.
2.2 Thematic Framework for Analysis
The review is structured around seven research dimensions that collectively address the complexity of food security in Pakistan. The first dimension examines the general food security situation, including indicators such as caloric intake, malnutrition rates, and household access to food. Climate change impacts form the second dimension, with emphasis on temperature variability, extreme weather events, and their cascading effects on crop yields. Policy and strategy analyses constitute the third dimension, evaluating the design and outcomes of national programs like the National Food Security Policy. Food production systems, the fourth dimension, assess trends in major crops (wheat, rice, sugarcane) and livestock. The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus, as the fifth dimension, explores trade-offs and synergies in resource allocation. The sixth dimension focuses on crisis responses, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, while the seventh situates Pakistanโs challenges within global dynamics like trade policies and price volatility.
2.3 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Studies were included if they: (1) explicitly addressed at least one of the predefined research dimensions, (2) provided empirical data or original analysis, (3) were published in English, and (4) had no temporal restrictions to capture historical trends. Exclusion criteria eliminated studies with insufficient methodological detail, non-peer-reviewed commentaries, or those focused solely on adjacent topics (e.g., general agricultural economics without food security linkages). Editorials, conference abstracts without full papers, and studies lacking region-specific findings were also excluded.
2.4 Study Selection Process
The initial search yielded 517 records, reduced to 419 after removing 97 duplicates and one irrelevant entry. Title and abstract screening excluded 317 records that did not meet inclusion criteria. Full-text assessment of the remaining 72 articles led to the exclusion of 18 studies due to ineligible scope or inadequate data. The final review included 54 studies, as illustrated in the PRISMA flowchart (Figure 1).
Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart of the study selection process
Two reviewers independently screened records, resolving discrepancies through consensus. Quality assessment prioritized studies with clear research questions, robust methodologies (e.g., longitudinal data, randomized controls), and explicit links to food security theory. Limitations include potential geographic biasโmost studies focused on Punjab and Sindh, underrepresenting Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwaโand a predominance of crop-centric analyses over dietary diversity or consumption patterns. Additionally, gray literature from government reports was underrepresented due to accessibility constraints.
3 Results
Figure 2. Research trends in the domain of food security in Pakistan: Challenges, policies, and future directions
The general food security situation in Pakistan is characterized by persistent challenges in availability, accessibility, and utilization, despite the countryโs agricultural potential. Studies highlight a paradox where Pakistan, being a major producer of staple crops like wheat and rice, continues to face significant food insecurity at the household level. For instance,[14] demonstrates that while food crop production has increased over the years, population growth has outpaced these gains, leading to a net decline in per capita food availability. This discrepancy is further exacerbated by regional disparities, with rural areas and economically marginalized groups experiencing higher levels of food insecurity compared to urban populations.[15]
A critical dimension of food security in Pakistan is accessibility, which is influenced by socioeconomic factors such as income levels, market access, and infrastructure. Research by[16] and[17] identifies household income, education, and land ownership as key determinants of food security, with landless laborers and small-scale farmers being particularly vulnerable. Moreover,[18] emphasizes the role of market access in enhancing food security for rural households, noting that poor transportation networks and price volatility often limit the ability of small farmers to sell surplus produce or purchase food during shortages. These findings underscore the need for policies that address both production deficits and structural barriers to food access.
Policy interventions aimed at improving food security have yielded mixed results, as evidenced by[19] and.[20] While initiatives like the National Food Security Policy and subsidy programs have improved food availability in some regions, their effectiveness is often undermined by poor implementation, corruption, and a lack of targeted approaches. For example,[21] argues that non-farmers benefit more from existing policies than smallholder farmers, who remain disproportionately affected by food insecurity. Similarly,[22] calls for a more holistic policy framework that integrates nutrition, climate resilience, and equitable resource distribution to address the multifaceted nature of food insecurity.
Table 1 provides a comprehensive taxonomy of the included studies, categorizing them based on their focus within the broader theme of food security in Pakistan. The table highlights the diversity of research approaches, from production trends and household-level analyses to policy evaluations and crisis responses.
Table 1. Taxonomy of studies on the general food security situation in Pakistan
The reviewed literature consistently identifies climate change as a critical threat multiplier for food security in Pakistan, exacerbating existing vulnerabilities through direct and indirect pathways. Rising temperatures, erratic precipitation patterns, and increased frequency of extreme weather events disrupt agricultural productivity, which remains the backbone of the countryโs food system. Studies such as[39] and[40] demonstrate that climate-induced yield reductions for staple crops like wheat and rice could reach 8โ15% by 2050 under current adaptation trajectories, with disproportionate impacts on smallholder farmers who lack access to irrigation or climate-resilient seeds. These projections align with findings from,[41] which notes that Pakistanโs agro-ecological zonesโparticularly the arid plains of Punjab and Sindhโare experiencing accelerated desertification and soil salinity due to prolonged droughts and inefficient water use.
The interplay between climate variability and socio-economic factors further compounds food insecurity. Research by[42] reveals how climate shocks interact with population growth and market globalization to destabilize local food systems, creating feedback loops where price volatility reduces household purchasing power during crop failures. For example, the 2022 floodsโwhich submerged one-third of the countryโdestroyed 4.5 million acres of cropland and caused a 40% spike in vegetable prices, pushing an additional 5.8 million people into food insecurity according to.[43] Such events disproportionately affect marginalized groups, as evidenced by,[44] which documents how climate-related food shortages exacerbate gender disparities in nutrition, with women and girls often reducing their meal portions to prioritize male family members.
Table 3. Taxonomy of climate change impacts on Pakistanโs food security
As shown in Table 3, regional disparities in climate vulnerability are pronounced. While Punjab and Sindh face water scarcity and salinity, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK) contends with rainfall variability that threatens maize productionโa critical staple for local food security.[59] The table also highlights emerging solutions, such as drought-tolerant maize varieties that have increased yields by 18โ22% in climate-stressed regions.[60] However, policy responses remain fragmented, with[61] critiquing Pakistanโs National Adaptation Plan for lacking enforceable targets or budget allocations to scale such innovations.
The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus emerges as a critical but understudied dimension in the climate-food security relationship. Studies like[62] and[63] argue that climate change intensifies competition for scarce water resources between agriculture (90% of national water use) and energy production, yet no reviewed study comprehensively models these trade-offs at provincial scales. This gap underscores the need for integrated nexus approaches in future research and policy design.
Pakistanโs food security policies and strategies reflect a complex interplay of historical legacies, contemporary challenges, and aspirational goals. The reviewed literature reveals a policy landscape marked by both progressive reforms and persistent implementation gaps. A critical analysis of these frameworks demonstrates how structural inefficiencies, resource constraints, and governance challenges hinder their effectiveness in addressing food insecurity.
The National Food Security Policy (NFSP) of 2018 serves as the cornerstone of Pakistanโs strategic approach, aiming to achieve โfood security for all through sustainable agricultural growth, improved nutrition, and social protection.โ[64] However, studies such as[65] and[66] identify significant flaws in its execution, including inadequate budget allocations, weak inter-ministerial coordination, and limited engagement with local stakeholders. For instance, while the NFSP emphasizes climate-smart agriculture, only 12% of its proposed initiatives had dedicated funding as of 2022.[67] Similarly, the policyโs nutrition targetsโsuch as reducing stunting from 38% to 30% by 2030โlack clear roadmaps for multi-sectoral collaboration between agriculture, health, and education ministries.[68]
Table 4. Taxonomy of food security policies and strategies in Pakistan
The regulatory environment for food safety presents another critical dimension. While Pakistan has made strides in aligning its food laws with international standardsโsuch as the 2018 Pure Food Rules adopting Codex Alimentarius guidelinesโenforcement remains inconsistent, particularly in informal rural markets.[77] Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) face disproportionate compliance burdens, as noted by,[78] which found that only 23% of food-processing SMEs in Punjab could meet both local and international safety standards due to high certification costs. Conversely, the nascent Organic Food Policy (2021) shows promise in creating export opportunities but struggles to integrate smallholder farmers, who lack access to certification systems and premium markets.[79]
Agricultural input policies exhibit similar contradictions. The Kissan Package (2022) provides subsidies for fertilizers and seeds, yet[80] demonstrates that 68% of these benefits accrue to large landowners, exacerbating inequalities among small-scale producers. Precision agriculture technologies could mitigate such disparities, but their adoption is hampered by digital literacy gaps and unreliable rural connectivity.[81] Water governance policies like the National Water Policy (2018) theoretically embrace the water-energy-food nexus but fail to mandate cross-sectoral water allocations, leading to unsustainable groundwater extraction for irrigation.[82]
The COVID-19 pandemic tested Pakistanโs crisis-response frameworks, revealing both resilience and exclusion. The Ehsaas Emergency Cash program disbursed $1.2 billion to 12 million households, yet excluded critical groups like landless farm laborers who comprise 42% of the agricultural workforce.[83] Such gaps underscore the need for adaptive social protection systems that recognize the informal nature of Pakistanโs food economy.
Emerging strategies show potential for transformative impact. The National Zero Hunger Programโs focus on school feeding in food-insecure districts has improved child nutrition indicators by 11โ14% in pilot areas, though coverage remains below 15% of the target population.[84] Similarly, provincial initiatives like Punjabโs Climate-Smart Agriculture Plan demonstrate how decentralized governance can tailor solutions to local agro-ecological conditions, yet inter-provincial coordination remains weak.[85] These examples highlight the importance of polycentric governance models that balance national standardization with regional flexibility.
Pakistanโs food production systems are characterized by a dual focus on staple crops and livestock, both of which play critical roles in national food security and economic stability. The reviewed literature reveals significant variations in production trends, challenges, and future prospects across different agricultural subsectors, with wheat, rice, and red meat emerging as particularly crucial components of the food system.
Wheat production dominates Pakistanโs agricultural landscape, serving as the primary staple crop for domestic consumption. Studies such as[86] and[87] highlight that wheat accounts for approximately 60% of daily caloric intake among Pakistanis, making its reliable production essential for food security. However, yield growth has stagnated in recent years due to multiple factors including outdated farming practices, water scarcity, and climate variability.[88] projects that without substantial investments in climate-resilient varieties and irrigation efficiency, wheat yields could decline by 10-15% by 2035 under current climate change scenarios. The global context of wheat production further complicates Pakistanโs situation, as[89] emphasizes the countryโs vulnerability to international price fluctuations given its periodic reliance on imports to meet domestic shortfalls.
Rice production represents another critical component of Pakistanโs food system, particularly for export earnings and regional food security. As[90] demonstrates, Pakistan ranks among Asiaโs top rice exporters, with basmati varieties generating significant foreign exchange revenue. However, rice cultivation faces mounting challenges from water-intensive production methods and competition for irrigation resources. The study notes that while rice contributes substantially to national food security through income generation, its water footprint raises sustainability concerns in water-stressed regions like Punjab.
Livestock production, particularly red meat, constitutes a vital but often overlooked dimension of Pakistanโs food security.[91] reveals that Pakistan possesses one of the worldโs largest livestock populations, with red meat production serving as both a protein source for domestic consumption and an economic driver for rural households. The study employs time-series analysis to project steady growth in meat production, but identifies feed shortages, disease outbreaks, and inefficient supply chains as persistent constraints. Notably, livestock contributes approximately 11% to Pakistanโs GDP while supporting the livelihoods of 30-35 million rural residents, underscoring its socioeconomic importance beyond direct food provision.
Table 5. Taxonomy of food production systems in Pakistan
Crop rotation systems present an alternative approach to enhancing food production sustainability, particularly for small-scale farmers.[97] provides empirical evidence from Punjab demonstrating that crop rotation can improve soil fertility and economic returns compared to monoculture systems. However, adoption remains limited due to knowledge gaps, market access barriers, and short-term economic pressures on smallholders. The study concludes that targeted extension services and policy incentives could significantly increase the uptake of diversified cropping systems.
The production systems analysis reveals several cross-cutting challenges that constrain Pakistanโs food output. Water scarcity affects all major crops, with wheat and rice particularly vulnerable to irrigation shortages. Climate change exacerbates these challenges through temperature increases and erratic precipitation patterns. Moreover, the studies collectively identify technological gaps, particularly in post-harvest management and value addition, as critical bottlenecks limiting the efficiency of food production systems. While each subsector faces unique constraints, the literature consistently emphasizes the need for integrated solutions that address production challenges while considering environmental sustainability and economic viability.
The absence of studies focusing on other important crops like sugarcane, maize, and horticultural products in our reviewed literature represents a notable gap. Future research should expand the scope to include these production systems, particularly given their growing importance in Pakistanโs agricultural economy and dietary patterns. Additionally, the interplay between crop and livestock production systemsโsuch as crop residue use for animal feedโwarrants further investigation to understand synergies and trade-offs in Pakistanโs food security strategy.
The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus has emerged as a critical framework for understanding the interconnected challenges of resource management and food security in Pakistan. The reviewed studies highlight how competition for scarce water resources, energy demands for irrigation, and agricultural production constraints create complex trade-offs that require integrated policy solutions. This nexus approach provides a systems-level perspective that transcends traditional sectoral boundaries, offering insights into sustainable resource allocation and climate adaptation strategies.
A dominant theme in the literature is the systemic analysis of WEF interdependencies, particularly in the context of climate change and agricultural sustainability. Studies such as[98] and[99] employ modeling approaches to quantify the trade-offs between water allocation for agriculture (which consumes 90% of Pakistanโs freshwater) and energy production.[100] demonstrates that optimizing irrigation schedules could reduce groundwater depletion by 18โ22% while maintaining crop yields, but this requires reliable energy access for tube wellsโa challenge in regions like Balochistan where power outages last 12โ16 hours daily. Similarly,[101] positions the nexus as a climate adaptation strategy, showing how integrated water management could buffer against the projected 30% decline in Indus River flows by 2100 due to glacial retreat. These findings are corroborated by,[102] which argues that Pakistanโs current siloed policiesโsuch as separate water and energy subsidiesโexacerbate resource inefficiencies and undermine food security goals.
Table 6. Taxonomy of water-energy-food nexus studies in Pakistan
Regional disparities in WEF nexus challenges are particularly pronounced, as evidenced byโ[108]s fieldwork in Balochistan. The study reveals that 62% of farmers experience severe mismatches between irrigation water availability and energy supply, forcing them to rely on expensive diesel pumps that consume 35โ40% of production costs. This aligns with broader findings from[109] on the spatial variability of nexus pressures, where Punjabโs canal-fed systems face different constraints than Sindhโs groundwater-dependent agriculture or Khyber Pakhtunkhwaโs rainfed zones. The Balochistan case study also highlights governance gaps, with[110] noting that provincial water policies rarely consider energy access dimensions, despite their interdependence for agricultural productivity.
Technological and policy innovations emerge as potential pathways for addressing WEF nexus challenges.[111] identifies precision agriculture and solar-powered irrigation as high-impact interventions, with pilot projects showing 30% reductions in both water and energy use for wheat cultivation. However, scaling these solutions requires addressing financial barriersโsmallholders often lack capital for solar panel investmentsโand regulatory hurdles, such as restrictions on groundwater extraction that inadvertently discourage water-saving technologies.[112] proposes institutional reforms, including the establishment of cross-sectoral planning committees at provincial levels and the integration of nexus indicators into national food security monitoring systems.
The reviewed studies collectively underscore two critical gaps in current WEF nexus research. First, while several papers analyze the water-food or energy-food dyads, few examine the full triad of interactions, particularly how energy policy decisions (e.g., hydropower dam construction) reverberate through agricultural systems. Second, there is limited empirical evidence on the socioeconomic dimensions of nexus transitionsโfor instance, how shifting from flood irrigation to drip systems affects labor markets or gender roles in rural communities. Addressing these gaps could strengthen the policy relevance of nexus research and its applicability to Pakistanโs diverse agro-ecological contexts.
The WEF nexus framework ultimately challenges conventional policy paradigms by demonstrating how sector-specific solutions often generate unintended consequences across interconnected systems. As Pakistan faces mounting pressures from population growth, climate change, and economic development, adopting a nexus perspective will be essential for designing coherent strategies that balance food production, resource sustainability, and energy security objectives. The studies reviewed provide a foundation for such an approach but also highlight the need for more localized, empirical research to inform context-specific implementation pathways.
3.6 Food Security and Related Global Issues
The intersection of Pakistanโs food security challenges with global dynamics presents a complex landscape where domestic vulnerabilities are compounded by transnational forces. The reviewed literature reveals how geopolitical conflicts, climate change, population growth, and international trade regimes collectively shape Pakistanโs food security trajectory, often exacerbating existing systemic weaknesses.
A dominant theme in the literature concerns the impact of global conflicts on food security, with[113] demonstrating how geopolitical tensions disrupt international food supply chains and commodity markets. The study highlights Pakistanโs particular vulnerability to wheat and edible oil price shocks, given its reliance on imports to bridge domestic production gaps. This vulnerability was starkly exposed during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which triggered a 37% increase in global wheat prices and forced Pakistan to divert scarce foreign reserves to maintain food imports. Similarly,[114] analyzes how the subordination of food security to market mechanisms under globalization has deepened food insecurity in developing nations, arguing that international financial institutionsโ structural adjustment programs have systematically weakened Pakistanโs agricultural support systems since the 1990s.
Table 8. Taxonomy of global issues impacting Pakistanโs food security
The synthesis of findings across the reviewed literature reveals several critical patterns that collectively reshape our understanding of food security in Pakistan. Taken together, the studies consistently demonstrate that food insecurity in Pakistan stems not from singular causes but from complex, interrelated systems where environmental, economic, and governance factors converge. This systemic nature of food insecurity emerges across studies as a fundamental characteristic that demands integrated policy responses rather than sector-specific interventions.
Climate change consistently appears as a threat multiplier across multiple dimensions of food security. While individual studies such as[121] and[122] quantify yield reductions for specific crops, the collective evidence suggests that climate impacts extend beyond agricultural production to disrupt entire food systems. The literature reveals a concerning pattern where climate-induced production shocks interact with market mechanisms to amplify food price volatility, disproportionately affecting low-income households.[123] This systemic vulnerability is further compounded by Pakistanโs heavy reliance on climate-sensitive water resources, as demonstrated by[124] and,[125] creating a feedback loop where water scarcity begets energy shortages that in turn constrain agricultural productivity.
The policy analysis presents a paradox where progressive frameworks coexist with implementation failures. The National Food Security Policy[126] and related strategies demonstrate conceptual sophistication in recognizing the multidimensional nature of food security, yet their translation into effective action remains inconsistent. This gap between policy intent and outcomes emerges across studies as a persistent challenge, with[127] and[128] highlighting how elite capture of agricultural subsidies and weak intergovernmental coordination undermine policy effectiveness. The COVID-19 response[129] further exposed these systemic governance weaknesses, where despite innovative programs like Ehsaas Emergency Cash, exclusionary targeting left critical populations like landless agricultural workers unprotected.
The water-energy-food nexus literature offers particularly valuable insights for rethinking food security strategies. Studies such as[130] and[131] move beyond traditional sectoral analyses to demonstrate how integrated resource management could simultaneously address multiple food security challenges. Their findings suggest that nexus approaches could yield co-benefitsโfor instance, solar-powered irrigation reducing both water extraction and fossil fuel dependenceโbut also reveal institutional barriers that currently prevent such synergies from being realized at scale.[132] This body of research collectively argues for a paradigm shift in food security governance, from compartmentalized ministries to integrated planning frameworks.
The global dimensions of food security present both vulnerabilities and opportunities. While[133] and[134] rightly emphasize how international conflicts and trade regimes exacerbate Pakistanโs food insecurity,[135] and[136] point to underutilized avenues for South-South cooperation and technology transfer. This tension between global risks and potential collaborations emerges as a key theme, suggesting that Pakistanโs food security strategy must balance defensive measures against external shocks with proactive engagement in international knowledge networks.
Several theoretical implications arise from this synthesis. First, the evidence challenges linear models of food security that treat availability, access, and utilization as sequential rather than interconnected dimensions. The reviewed studies consistently demonstrate feedback loops between these componentsโfor example, where climate change reduces availability, which then constrains access through price mechanisms, ultimately affecting utilization through dietary compromises.[137] Second, the literature supports complex adaptive systems theory as a framework for understanding Pakistanโs food security challenges, where interventions in one domain often produce unintended consequences in others. This perspective helps explain why narrowly focused policies frequently fail to achieve their intended impacts.
Practically, the findings suggest several actionable pathways. For policymakers, the evidence underscores the urgency of moving beyond production-centric approaches to address the structural barriers that limit food access and utilization. This includes reforming social protection systems to better target vulnerable populations, as demonstrated by the gaps in COVID-19 responses.[138] Agricultural extension services could integrate climate adaptation strategies with nutrition education, recognizing that farm-level resilience and dietary diversity are mutually reinforcing. The private sector could play a greater role in developing innovative solutions, particularly in post-harvest management and food distribution technologies that emerged as critical bottlenecks across multiple studies.
The review process encountered several methodological limitations that warrant acknowledgment. The predominance of studies focused on Punjab and Sindh introduces geographic bias, potentially overlooking unique food security dynamics in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The exclusion of non-English literature may have omitted valuable perspectives from local researchers. Publication bias towards negative findings could skew the representation of successful interventions. Most significantly, the scarcity of longitudinal studies limits our ability to assess how food security drivers and outcomes evolve over time.
Future research should address these gaps while exploring several promising directions. There is a critical need for studies that examine the full water-energy-food nexus rather than its bilateral components, employing integrated modeling approaches that capture cross-sectoral interactions. The gender dimensions of food security require deeper investigation, particularly how climate adaptation strategies affect womenโs labor burdens and nutritional status. Comparative studies across Pakistanโs diverse agro-ecological zones could identify context-specific solutions rather than assuming one-size-fits-all approaches. Finally, implementation science methods could help bridge the persistent gap between policy design and execution, identifying the institutional and political economy factors that enable or constrain effective food security governance.
The reviewed literature collectively paints a picture of Pakistanโs food security as a complex, dynamic challenge that defies simple solutions. While the scale of the problem is daunting, the synthesis also reveals numerous entry points for transformative actionโfrom climate-smart agriculture to integrated resource governance to inclusive social protection. Realizing this potential will require moving beyond fragmented approaches to embrace the systemic nature of food insecurity, with interventions designed to address multiple dimensions simultaneously. The evidence suggests that such integrated strategies, while challenging to implement, offer the most promising path toward sustainable food security for Pakistanโs growing population.
5 Conclusion
This systematic review has synthesized diverse perspectives on Pakistanโs food security challenges, policies, and future directions, revealing a complex interplay of environmental, economic, and governance factors. The findings confirm that food insecurity in Pakistan stems not from isolated production deficits but from systemic vulnerabilitiesโclimate change exacerbating water scarcity, policy implementation gaps perpetuating inequalities, and global market dynamics amplifying domestic price volatility. The analysis underscores how these interconnected challenges demand integrated solutions that transcend traditional sectoral boundaries, particularly in addressing the water-energy-food nexus and climate adaptation. The review contributes to theoretical understanding by demonstrating the limitations of linear food security models in Pakistanโs context, where availability, access, and utilization interact through feedback loops. Practically, the synthesis highlights the urgency of reforming agricultural policies to prioritize smallholder resilience, strengthening social protection systems for crisis responsiveness, and fostering cross-sectoral governance mechanisms. Future research should focus on longitudinal assessments of policy impacts, gender-differentiated adaptation strategies, and localized nexus analyses to bridge persistent knowledge gaps. The path forward requires both immediate actions to mitigate current food insecurity and long-term systemic transformations to build climate-resilient, equitable food systems.
[1] P Pinstrup-Andersen, โFood Security: Definition and Measurement,โ Food Security, 2009.
[2] A Ishaq, M Khalid, and E Ahmad, โFood Insecurity in Pakistan: A Region-Wise Analysis of Trends,โ Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, 2018.
[3] AA Chandio, J Yuansheng, and H Magsi, โAgricultural Sub-Sectors Performance: An Analysis of Sector-Wise Share in Agriculture GDP of Pakistan,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2016.
[4] S Asad, โSDGs in Pakistan: An Analysis,โ Unavailable, 2019.
[5] T Niazi, โRural Poverty and the Green Revolution: The Lessons from Pakistan,โ Journal of Peasant Studies, 2004.
[6] S Block, โThe Decline and Rise of Agricultural Productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa Since 1961,โ African Successes, Volume IV: Sustainable Growth, 2014.
[7] A Hussain, F Zulfiqar, and A Saboor, โChanging Food Patterns Across the Seasons in Rural Pakistan: Analysis of Food Variety, Dietary Diversity and Calorie Intake,โ Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 2014.
[8] U Ali et al., โClimate Change Impacts on Agriculture Sector: A Case Study of Pakistan,โ Ciรชncia Rural, 2021.
[9] H Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan: A Systems Analysis with Global Implications,โ Agricultural Systems, 2026.
[10] H UbaidโurโRehman, W Asghar, and N Khalid, โFood Security Challenges for Pakistan During COVIDโ19 Pandemic: An Overview of the Response Plan,โ World Food Policy, 2021.
[11] C Nieto et al., โThe INFORMAS Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (FoodโEPI) in m Exico: A n Assessment of Implementation Gaps and Priority Recommendations,โ Obesity Reviews, 2019.
[12] N Nisar et al., โKissan Madadgar: Pioneering Agri-Tech in Pakistan, the Journey to Conquer Sindh,โ Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 2025.
[13] MJ Page et al., โThe PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,โ BMJ 372 (2021): n71.
[14] M Islam et al., โGrowth Analysis of Production of Food Crops and Population Growth for Food Security in Pakistan: Growth Analysis of Production of Food Crops and Population,โ Proceedings of the Pakistan Academy of Sciences, 2023.
[15] T Ahmad and A Saboor, โFood Security in Pakistan and Need for Public Policy Adjustments,โ Policy Perspectives, 2022.
[16] U Iram and MS Butt, โDeterminants of Household Food Security: An Empirical Analysis for Pakistan,โ International Journal of Social Economics, 2004.
[17] A Sultana and A Kiani, โDeterminants of Food Security at Household Level in Pakistan,โ African Journal of Business Management, 2011.
[18] UI Ahmed et al., โStatus and Determinants of Small Farming Householdsโ Food Security and Role of Market Access in Enhancing Food Security in Rural Pakistan,โ PloS One, 2017.
[19] MK Bashir and S Schilizzi, โHave Policies in Pakistan Been Effective for Improving Food Security? Wanted: Disaggregated Policy Assessment,โ World Applied Sciences Journal, 2012.
[20] SA Ramay, โState of Food Security in Pakistan and Policy Options,โ Sustainable Development Policy Institute of Pakistan, 2014.
[21] Ahmad and Saboor, โFood Security in Pakistan and Need for Public Policy Adjustments.โ
[22] A Hameed, TM Ali, and MMJ Abbasi, โComparative Analysis of Food and Nutrition Security in Pakistan: Implications for Sustainable Development Policies,โ SAGE Open, 2024.
[23] Islam et al., โGrowth Analysis of Production of Food Crops and Population Growth for Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[24] N Asghar, A Afzal, and G Hameed, โFuture Food Demand for Pakistan: An Analysis,โ Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 2023.
[25] Ahmed et al., โStatus and Determinants of Small Farming Householdsโ Food Security and Role of Market Access in Enhancing Food Security in Rural Pakistan.โ
[26] Iram and Butt, โDeterminants of Household Food Security.โ
[27] Sultana and Kiani, โDeterminants of Food Security at Household Level in Pakistan.โ
[28] Ahmad and Saboor, โFood Security in Pakistan and Need for Public Policy Adjustments.โ
[29] Bashir and Schilizzi, โHave Policies in Pakistan Been Effective for Improving Food Security? Wanted.โ
[30] Ramay, โState of Food Security in Pakistan and Policy Options.โ
[31] Ahmad and Saboor, โFood Security in Pakistan and Need for Public Policy Adjustments.โ
[32] Hameed, Ali, and Abbasi, โComparative Analysis of Food and Nutrition Security in Pakistan.โ
[33] UbaidโurโRehman, Asghar, and Khalid, โFood Security Challenges for Pakistan During COVIDโ19 Pandemic.โ
[34] I Khalid, โFood Security: Understanding Pakistanโs National Security Concern,โ Special Issue 2018 J. Pol. Stud., 2018.
[35] ZU Muhammad et al., โContemporary Investigations of Pakistan Food Insecurity and Trends of Global Food Supply and Demand,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2014.
[36] Hameed, Ali, and Abbasi, โComparative Analysis of Food and Nutrition Security in Pakistan.โ
[37] M Ahmad and U Farooq, โThe State of Food Security in Pakistan: Future Challenges and Coping Strategies,โ The Pakistan Development Review, 2010.
[38] A Rasheed et al., โFood Security and Food Rights Challenges: A Policy Perspective from Pakistan,โ Ilkogretim Online, 2020.
[39] A Aziz, โClimate Change: A Growing Challenge for Food Security in Pakistan,โ Social Science Review Archives, 2025.
[40] A Saleem et al., โSecuring a Sustainable Future: The Climate Change Threat to Agriculture, Food Security, and Sustainable Development Goals,โ Journal of Umm Al-Qura University – Sciences, 2025.
[41] MSB Khetran and MAN Salik, โAssessing the Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in Pakistan: Challenges and Solutions,โ Journal of Interdisciplinary Insights, 2024.
[42] S Abbas et al., โClimate Variability, Population Growth, and Globalization Impacting Food Security in Pakistan,โ Scientific Reports, 2025.
[43] S Naz, Z Iqbal, and S Begum, โClimate Changeโs Impact on Food Security in Pakistan: Challenges and Mitigation Strategies,โ Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 2024.
[44] S Habib, H Karim, and ZA Lehri, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Womenโs Nutrition and Food Security in Pakistan,โ Policy Journal of Social Science Review, 2025.
[46] Saleem et al., โSecuring a Sustainable Future.โ
[47] JS Bandara and Y Cai, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Food Crop Productivity, Food Prices and Food Security in South Asia,โ Economic Analysis and Policy, 2014.
[48] Khetran and Salik, โAssessing the Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[49] MS Farooq and H Fatima, โGlobal Climate Change and Natural Disasters: A Threat to Sustainable Food Production and Food Security of Pakistan,โ REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA, 2022.
[50] Naz, Iqbal, and Begum, โClimate Changeโs Impact on Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[51] Habib, Karim, and Lehri, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Womenโs Nutrition and Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[52] Khetran and Salik, โAssessing the Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[53] S Akbar, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in KPK, Pakistan an Analysis,โ Social Science Review Archives, 2025.
[55] M Rizwanullah et al., โResilience in Maize Production for Food Security: Evaluating the Role of Climate-Related Abiotic Stress in Pakistan,โ Heliyon, 2023.
[57] Naz, Iqbal, and Begum, โClimate Changeโs Impact on Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[58] AA Chandio et al., โClimate Change and Food Security of South Asia: Fresh Evidence from a Policy Perspective Using Novel Empirical Analysis,โ Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2023.
[59] Akbar, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in KPK, Pakistan an Analysis.โ
[60] Rizwanullah et al., โResilience in Maize Production for Food Security.โ
[61] Chandio et al., โClimate Change and Food Security of South Asia.โ
[62] Farooq and Fatima, โGlobal Climate Change and Natural Disasters.โ
[63] Khetran and Salik, โAssessing the Impact of Climate Change on Food Security in Pakistan.โ
[64] MT Sultan, AM Noman, and H Raza, โFood Laws of Pakistan: Current Flaws and Strategic Future Reforms,โ Legal Research & Analysis, 2025.
[66] HA Mughal and F Faisal, โProspects and Challenges in the Development of Organic Food Policies and Practices in Pakistan a Marketing Perspective,โ Governance and Management Review, 2021.
[67] AA Nasr Ullah and MA Khan, โEmpowering Agriculture for Food Security and Economic Growth: Implementation Strategies in Pakistan,โ Policy, 2022.
[68] SRH Bukhari, AU Khan, and S Noreen, โOptimizing Water Resource Governance for Sustainable Agricultural and Hydroelectric Development in Pakistan: An in-Depth Examination and Policy Prescriptions,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2024.
[69] Sultan, Noman, and Raza, โFood Laws of Pakistan.โ
[70] T Qamar et al., โAssessing the Effectiveness of Local and International Food Safety Standards in Small and Mediumโsized Enterprises (SMEs) of Pakistan,โ Journal of Food Quality, 2024.
[71] Mughal and Faisal, โProspects and Challenges in the Development of Organic Food Policies and Practices in Pakistan a Marketing Perspective.โ
[72] I Nazeer, โOptimizing Agricultural Inputs and Cropped Area Dynamics: A Decade-Long Analysis in Pakistan,โ International Journal of Agriculture and Sustainable Development, 2024.
[73] Ullah and Khan, โEmpowering Agriculture for Food Security and Economic Growth.โ
[74] Bukhari, Khan, and Noreen, โOptimizing Water Resource Governance for Sustainable Agricultural and Hydroelectric Development in Pakistan.โ
[75] D Azziz, W Ahmad, and R Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN,โ WAtER & ENvIRoNMENt, 2017.
[76] Ullah and Khan, โEmpowering Agriculture for Food Security and Economic Growth.โ
[77] Sultan, Noman, and Raza, โFood Laws of Pakistan.โ
[78] Qamar et al., โAssessing the Effectiveness of Local and International Food Safety Standards in Small and Mediumโsized Enterprises (SMEs) of Pakistan.โ
[79] Mughal and Faisal, โProspects and Challenges in the Development of Organic Food Policies and Practices in Pakistan a Marketing Perspective.โ
[80] Nazeer, โOptimizing Agricultural Inputs and Cropped Area Dynamics.โ
[81] Ullah and Khan, โEmpowering Agriculture for Food Security and Economic Growth.โ
[82] Bukhari, Khan, and Noreen, โOptimizing Water Resource Governance for Sustainable Agricultural and Hydroelectric Development in Pakistan.โ
[83] Ullah and Khan, โEmpowering Agriculture for Food Security and Economic Growth.โ
[85] Azziz, Ahmad, and Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN.โ
[86] A Shahzad et al., โCurrent Situation and Future Prospects of Wheat Production in Pakistan,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2022.
[87] B Shiferaw et al., โCrops That Feed the World 10. Past Successes and Future Challenges to the Role Played by Wheat in Global Food Security,โ Food Security, 2013.
[88] Shahzad et al., โCurrent Situation and Future Prospects of Wheat Production in Pakistan.โ
[89] Shiferaw et al., โCrops That Feed the World 10. Past Successes and Future Challenges to the Role Played by Wheat in Global Food Security.โ
[90] N Bandumula, โRice Production in Asia: Key to Global Food Security,โ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018.
[91] MN Akram et al., โFuture Trends of Red Meat Production in Pakistan: Time Series Analysis.โ Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 2022.
[92] Shahzad et al., โCurrent Situation and Future Prospects of Wheat Production in Pakistan.โ
[93] Shiferaw et al., โCrops That Feed the World 10. Past Successes and Future Challenges to the Role Played by Wheat in Global Food Security.โ
[95] Akram et al., โFuture Trends of Red Meat Production in Pakistan.โ
[96] MA Hassaan et al., โCrop Rotation as an Economic Strategy for Small-Scale Farmers: Evidence from Punjab, Pakistan,โ Journal of Oasis Agriculture and Sustainable Development, 2024.
[98] Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan.โ
[99] G Rasul and B Sharma, โThe Nexus Approach to WaterโEnergyโFood Security: An Option for Adaptation to Climate Change,โ Climate Policy, 2016.
[100] Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan.โ
[101] Rasul and Sharma, โThe Nexus Approach to WaterโEnergyโFood Security.โ
[102] Azziz, Ahmad, and Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN.โ
[103] Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan.โ
[104] Rasul and Sharma, โThe Nexus Approach to WaterโEnergyโFood Security.โ
[105] Azziz, Ahmad, and Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN.โ
[106] W Gul, M Makki, and T Yamin, โWater Energy Food Security Nexus: Perspectives and Challenges in Balochistan, Pakistan,โ International Journal of Sustainable Society, 2022.
[107] Azziz, Ahmad, and Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN.โ
[108] Gul, Makki, and Yamin, โWater Energy Food Security Nexus.โ
[109] Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan.โ
[110] Gul, Makki, and Yamin, โWater Energy Food Security Nexus.โ
[111] Iqbal et al., โOptimizing the Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Sustainable Agriculture in Pakistan.โ
[112] Azziz, Ahmad, and Rehan, โNEXUS APPRoACH to ADDRESS WAtER-ENERGY-FooD SECURItY oF PAKIStAN.โ
[113] CP Martin-Shields and W Stojetz, โFood Security and Conflict: Empirical Challenges and Future Opportunities for Research and Policy Making on Food Security and Conflict,โ World Development, 2019.
[114] P McMichael and M Schneider, โFood Security Politics and the Millennium Development Goals,โ Third World Quarterly, 2011.
[115] Martin-Shields and Stojetz, โFood Security and Conflict.โ
[116] MA Hanjra and ME Qureshi, โGlobal Water Crisis and Future Food Security in an Era of Climate Change,โ Food Policy, 2010.
[117] J Cheeseman, โFood Security in the Face of Salinity, Drought, Climate Change, and Population Growth,โ Halophytes for Food Security in Dry Lands, 2016.
[118] A Molotoks, P Smith, and TP Dawson, โImpacts of Land Use, Population, and Climate Change on Global Food Security,โ Food and Energy Security, 2021.
[119] McMichael and Schneider, โFood Security Politics and the Millennium Development Goals.โ
[120] J Beddington, โFood Security: Contributions from Science to a New and Greener Revolution,โ Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2010.
This study investigates the erosion of employment security among Pakistanโs social peripheryโinformal laborers, rural-urban migrants, religious minorities, and marginalized womenโfrom 2010 to 2025, a period marked by macroeconomic instability, climate shocks, and technological disruptions. We employ a mixed-methods approach, integrating quantitative analysis of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics and World Bank datasets with qualitative insights from 500 interviews and 10 Focus Group Discussions across three case clusters: climate-displaced agrarian workers, urban informal laborers, and digital gig workers. The Delphi Method further projects labor market challenges post-2025, engaging labor economists to forecast automation risks, climate migration, and debt traps. Our findings reveal a stark rise in informal employment from 65% to an estimated 75%, with employment security inversely correlated to GDP growth. Climate shocks, such as the 2010 and 2022 floods, precipitated a 15% drop in rural wages and pushed 33% of affected households into debt bondage. Gender disparities remain entrenched, with female labor force participation stagnating below 25% and home-based workers experiencing a 40% decline in real wages. Moreover, the gig economy, despite its 55% growth in digital freelancing, exacerbates precarity, as 60% of workers report income instability and lack access to social protection. The study highlights systemic policy gaps and advocates for inclusive social protection frameworks to address the vulnerabilities of Pakistanโs informal workforce, which constitutes 70% of the labor force. By bridging historical data with projected trends, this research contributes to under-documented lived experiences and informs urgent policy interventions to mitigate socio-economic risks in the face of automation, climate migration, and financialization.
Pakistanโs social peripheryโcomprising informal laborers, rural-urban migrants, religious minorities, and marginalized womenโhas long been excluded from formal labor protections, rendering them vulnerable to systemic precarity. Between 2010 and 2025, this vulnerability has intensified due to intersecting crises: macroeconomic instability, climate shocks, and technological disruptions. The countryโs labor market, already characterized by informality, has seen employment security erode further, with informal employment rising from 65% to an estimated 75% of the workforce. This trend reflects broader socio-economic fractures, where GDP growth often fails to translate into stable livelihoods for marginalized groups.[1]
The political and economic landscape of Pakistan during this period has been marked by volatility. Frequent policy shifts, coupled with external shocks such as climate-induced disasters and global economic sanctions, have exacerbated labor market insecurities.[2] For instance, the 2010 and 2022 floods not only displaced millions but also triggered a 15% decline in rural wages, pushing a third of affected households into debt bondage. These disruptions underscore the fragility of employment security among agrarian workers, a group already marginalized by Pakistanโs uneven development trajectory.[3]
Technological advancements, particularly the rise of the gig economy, have introduced new dimensions of precarity. While digital freelancing grew by 55% between 2018 and 2023, 60% of gig workers report income instability and lack access to health insurance or pensions. This paradox highlights how technological shifts, often framed as opportunities for economic inclusion, can instead deepen existing inequalities.[4] Gender disparities further compound these challenges, with female labor force participation stagnating below 25% and home-based workers experiencing a 40% decline in real wages since 2020.
This study seeks to bridge critical gaps in policy discourse by synthesizing historical data with projected trends. We hypothesize that systemic vulnerabilitiesโrooted in political instability, climate fragility, and labor market informalityโhave intensified precarity among Pakistanโs social periphery. Our mixed-methods approach combines quantitative analysis of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics datasets with qualitative insights from 500 interviews and 10 Focus Group Discussions, offering a granular understanding of lived experiences. The Delphi Method further extends our analysis to forecast post-2025 challenges, including automation risks and climate migration.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 details the research design and methods, Section 3 presents the results and analysis, Section 4 discusses policy implications, and Section 5 concludes with recommendations for inclusive social protection frameworks. By centering the voices of marginalized workers, this study aims to inform urgent interventions that address the intersectional precarity shaping Pakistanโs labor market.
2 Research Design and Methods
The study employs a mixed-methods framework to capture the multidimensional nature of employment insecurity among Pakistanโs social periphery. This approach integrates quantitative labor market analyses, qualitative explorations of lived experiences, and expert-driven forecasting to triangulate findings across temporal and spatial scales.
Longitudinal labor force data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) (2010โ2023) and World Bank datasets form the backbone of the quantitative analysis. Key metrics include informal employment rates, wage trends, and sectoral shifts, disaggregated by gender, geography, and religious affiliation. Regression models assess correlations between macroeconomic indicators (e.g., GDP growth, inflation) and employment security, controlling for climate shocks using flood impact data from the National Disaster Management Authority. For instance, the model specification for wage dynamics is:
where denotes real wages for group in year , is a binary indicator for climate shocks, and captures covariates like urbanization and sectoral composition.
2.2 Qualitative Fieldwork
To contextualize statistical trends, we conducted 500 semi-structured interviews and 10 Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) across three case clusters:
Climate-displaced agrarian workers in Sindh and Punjab, focusing on post-flood livelihood strategies.
Urban informal laborers in Karachi and Lahore, examining precarity in construction and domestic work.
Digital gig workers nationwide, probing platform-mediated labor conditions.
Interview transcripts were coded thematically using NVivo, with iterative validation through member-checking to ensure interpretive rigor. The FGDs, stratified by gender and occupation, revealed intersectional vulnerabilitiesโsuch as how minority women navigate wage theft in home-based work.
2.3 Forecasting via the Delphi Method
A panel of 15 labor economists iteratively assessed post-2025 risks through three Delphi rounds. Consensus emerged on three high-probability scenarios:
Automation displacing 20% of low-skilled jobs by 2030.
Climate migration amplifying urban informality.
Debt traps worsening due to predatory microfinance practices.
2.4 Ethical Considerations
Given the politicization of informal labor, all participants were anonymized, and data collection excluded regions with active conflict. Oral consent protocols accommodated low literacy rates among agrarian respondents.
This methodological pluralism enables a nuanced understanding of precarity, bridging macro-level trends with micro-level narratives while anticipating future disruptions.
3 Results and Analysis
The findings reveal a complex interplay of structural vulnerabilities and emerging risks that have reshaped employment security for Pakistanโs marginalized workforce. This section synthesizes quantitative trends with qualitative narratives to illuminate the lived realities of informal laborers, climate migrants, and gig workers amidst economic and environmental upheavals.
The period from 2010 to 2024 witnessed a significant expansion of Pakistanโs informal economy, with informal employment rising from approximately 65% to an estimated 75% of the total workforce. This trend reflects a broader structural shift in the labor market, where formal job creation has failed to keep pace with population growth and economic shocks. Analysis of Pakistan Bureau of Statistics data reveals that this informalization occurred despite periods of GDP growth, suggesting a decoupling between macroeconomic performance and employment quality.[5]
Employment Security and GDP Growth Paradox Contrary to conventional economic theory, employment security exhibited an inverse relationship with GDP growth spikes during this period. For instance, during the 2016-2018 GDP growth surge (averaging 5.8% annually), informal sector wages stagnated while job turnover rates increased by 22%. This paradox underscores how growth benefits have disproportionately accrued to capital rather than labor, particularly for marginalized groups.[6] The weakening of collective bargaining mechanisms and the decline of unionized work further exacerbated this trend, leaving workers vulnerable to arbitrary dismissals and wage cuts.
Sectoral Disparities in Informalization The informalization wave affected sectors unevenly:
Agriculture: Remained predominantly informal (92% in 2024), with climate shocks accelerating the displacement of smallholders into casual labor.
Manufacturing: Saw formal employment decline from 28% to 19% as export-oriented industries increasingly relied on subcontracting.
Services: Experienced the fastest informalization, particularly in retail and transport, where digital platforms disrupted traditional employment relationships.
Temporal Patterns of Precarity The longitudinal analysis identified three distinct phases of employment security erosion:
2010-2015: Post-flood recovery period marked by rural wage suppression and increased debt dependency.
2016-2020: Urban informalization surge linked to China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) infrastructure projects that favored temporary labor contracts.
2021-2024: Pandemic-induced precarity, where 68% of informal workers reported income losses exceeding 40% during lockdowns.
Regional Variations Geospatial analysis revealed stark disparities in informalization rates:
Punjabโs industrial districts maintained relatively higher formal employment (35%) due to textile sector clustering.
Sindhโs rural areas reached 85% informality by 2024, reflecting the collapse of small-scale agriculture.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwaโs conflict-affected zones showed extreme precarity, with 90% of workers lacking written contracts.
These trends collectively demonstrate how macroeconomic policies, combined with structural labor market weaknesses, have systematically eroded employment security for Pakistanโs most vulnerable workers. The qualitative interviews revealed that workers perceive this informalization not as temporary adaptation but as permanent exclusion from social protections, with profound implications for intergenerational mobility.
Environmental catastrophes and economic volatility have functioned as twin destabilizers of employment security for Pakistanโs social periphery, with climate shocks exhibiting particularly severe and persistent labor market effects. The 2010 superfloodsโwhich submerged one-fifth of Pakistanโs land areaโtriggered an immediate 15% contraction in rural wages across affected districts, a depression from which full recovery required five years according to PBS wage series data.[7] This protracted recovery period reflects how climate disasters compound existing vulnerabilities: displaced agrarian workers flooded urban labor markets, depressing wages through oversupply while simultaneously losing critical agricultural assets.
Debt Bondage and Asset Erosion The 2022 floods replicated this pattern with heightened severity, as 33% of surveyed households in Sindh and Balochistan reported complete loss of productive assets (livestock, tools, seed stocks) alongside new debt obligations averaging 142% of pre-flood annual income. This debt-income ratio, calculated from interview responses, pushed affected families into intergenerational poverty traps, with 68% reporting child labor as a coping mechanism. The qualitative data reveals how these shocks transform temporary precarity into permanent dispossession:
โAfter the waters receded, we owed the arhti (middleman) for seeds and diesel. Now my sons work his fields instead of going to schoolโhow else will we eat?โ (Male sharecropper, Jacobabad, 2023 interview)
Macroeconomic Policy Amplification of Shocks Economic policies frequently exacerbated environmental impacts. The analysis of State Bank data shows that monetary tightening during IMF programs (2013, 2019, 2023) coincided with rural credit contraction, limiting post-disaster recovery financing. When paired with flood-induced collateral damage, this created a perverse cycle where the most vulnerable workers faced the highest borrowing costsโinformal interest rates reached 36% APR in flood zones versus 22% nationally.
Differential Impact by Labor Segment The shocksโ labor market consequences varied starkly across peripheral groups:
Climate-Displaced Agrarian Workers
Experienced 18% longer wage recovery periods than urban informal workers post-2010 floods
41% transitioned to precarious non-farm work (construction, rickshaw driving) by 2024
Urban Informal Laborers
Saw temporary wage spikes (8-12%) during reconstruction booms, but these gains evaporated within 18 months
Reported 23% higher injury rates in post-flood construction work due to relaxed safety norms
Intersectional Vulnerabilities Minority communities faced compounded risksโHindu laborers in Sindh reported 28% lower post-disaster wage recovery than Muslim peers, reflecting discriminatory hiring in relief works. Similarly, women-headed households took 3.2 years longer to rebuild asset bases compared to male-headed households, constrained by mobility restrictions and unequal inheritance practices.
The temporal clustering of shocks (2010 floods, 2015 heatwave, 2022 floods) has created a โdisaster treadmillโ where peripheral workers exhaust coping mechanisms before fully recovering. Projections from the Delphi panel indicate this pattern will intensify, with climate-vulnerable districts likely facing 2-3 major labor market disruptions per decade by 2030. The data underscores that environmental and economic shocks do not merely interrupt livelihoodsโthey systematically reconfigure employment relationships toward greater precarity.
The study reveals persistent gender disparities in Pakistanโs labor market, with female participation rates stagnating below 25% throughout the 2010-2024 period. This stagnation contrasts sharply with the countryโs demographic transition, where the working-age female population grew by 32% during the same timeframe. Analysis of PBS Labor Force Surveys indicates that structural barriersโincluding social norms, mobility restrictions, and occupational segregationโhave systematically excluded women from formal employment opportunities.[8]
Home-Based Work and Wage Erosion Home-based workers, predominantly women engaged in piece-rate manufacturing (garments, handicrafts) and services (data entry, tutoring), experienced a 40% decline in real wages between 2020-2023 when adjusted for inflation. This precipitous drop reflects both demand shocks during the pandemic and the systemic devaluation of feminized labor. Qualitative interviews in Lahoreโs informal settlements highlighted how subcontracting chains exacerbate this precarity:
โThe agent pays Rs. 15 per embroidered shirt nowโit was Rs. 25 before COVID. He says machines do it cheaper, but my eyesight fails working 14 hours by lantern light.โ (Female home-based worker, 2022 interview)
Sectoral Segregation and Opportunity Gaps Gender disparities manifest differently across economic sectors:
Agriculture: Women constitute 72% of unpaid family workers but only 3% of landowning cultivators.
Manufacturing: Female participation concentrated in export-oriented sectors (textiles, surgical instruments) with 89% of workers lacking written contracts.
Services: Professional roles show modest gains (female share rising from 12% to 18% in education/healthcare), but informal care work remains predominant.
Intersectional Barriers for Minority Women Christian and Hindu women in urban centers reported 35% lower wages than Muslim peers for comparable work, compounded by religious discrimination in hiring. Similarly, transgender workers faced near-total exclusion from formal employment, with 92% relying on begging or sex work according to FGD participants in Karachi.
Policy Experimentation and Limited Impact Provincial initiatives like Punjabโs Women-on-Wheels program (2016) and Sindhโs Home-Based Workers Act (2018) showed localized successes but failed to scale. Evaluation of these interventions reveals implementation gapsโfor instance, only 0.2% of eligible home-based workers secured registration under the Sindh Act by 2023, leaving most unable to access promised social protections.
The Delphi panel projections suggest these gender gaps will persist absent structural reforms, with automation likely to displace women from routine manufacturing jobs (projected 18% loss by 2030) while creating limited opportunities in platform-mediated care work. The data underscores that Pakistanโs gendered labor market segmentation operates as both cause and consequence of broader employment security erosion.
3.4 Gig Economy Growth and Its Challenges
The rapid expansion of Pakistanโs digital gig economy presents a paradoxical development in the countryโs labor market landscape. While digital freelancing platforms reported 55% growth in registered users between 2018-2023, our mixed-methods analysis reveals that this apparent opportunity has introduced new forms of precarity for workers. Survey data indicates that 60% of gig workers experience income instability exceeding that of traditional informal laborers, with monthly earnings fluctuating by an average of 42%โa volatility coefficient nearly double that observed in street vending or domestic work.[9]
Platform-Mediated Precarity Three structural vulnerabilities characterize gig work in Pakistan:
Algorithmic Wage Suppression: 78% of interviewed freelancers reported progressive rate cuts on platforms like Upwork and Fiverr, where intense competition drives bidding wars. The average project fee for graphic design work fell from $85 in 2018 to$52 in 2023, despite rising skill requirements.
Payment Delays and Fraud: 33% of workers experienced client payment defaults, with dispute resolution mechanisms favoring international buyers. Case studies reveal that Pakistani freelancers spend 18% of their working hours chasing payments rather than productive work.
Absence of Social Protections: Unlike registered SMEs, gig platforms provide no health insurance, pensions, or injury coverageโa gap affecting 92% of surveyed workers.
Skill Polarization and Access Barriers The gig economy exhibits extreme skill-based stratification:
High-Skill Workers (software developers, UX designers): Capture 68% of platform earnings while comprising just 12% of users.
Low-Skill Workers (data entry, content moderation): Face diminishing returns, with real earnings declining 23% since 2020.
Geospatial analysis shows that access to lucrative gig work remains concentrated in urban tech hubs (Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad), where 81% of top-earning freelancers reside. Rural entrants face compounded disadvantagesโonly 14% have reliable broadband, and 63% rely on internet cafes that consume 22% of their earnings.
Gender Dimensions of Platform Work While digital freelancing theoretically offers women flexible participation, cultural constraints persist:
Female freelancers report spending 31% more time securing clients than male peers due to trust deficits.
72% use male pseudonyms to avoid harassment, limiting professional identity development.
Platform algorithms often steer women toward โfeminizedโ tasks (virtual assistance, transcription) that pay 40% less than male-dominated fields like programming.
Regulatory Vacuum and Worker Organizing Pakistanโs labor laws remain silent on platform work, creating jurisdictional ambiguities. Emerging worker-led responses include:
The Digital Workers Union (founded 2021), which negotiates bulk service contracts to bypass platforms.
Community networks sharing vetted client lists to reduce fraud risks.
However, these initiatives reach just 7% of gig workers, leaving most exposed to unmediated market risks. The Delphi panel warns that without policy intervention, automation may displace 45% of low-skill gig jobs by 2030 while concentrating opportunities among a small, highly skilled elite. This trajectory risks transforming the gig economy from a purported equalizer into yet another axis of labor market stratification.
The studyโs qualitative data captures this duality through workersโ narratives:
โFreelancing let me escape the garment factoryโs abuse, but now Iโm trapped in a different cageโchasing ratings, terrified of algorithms.โ (Female graphic designer, Faisalabad, 2023 interview)
This tension between opportunity and precarity underscores the need for regulatory frameworks that address platform capitalismโs unique risks while preserving its potential for flexible employment. Current trajectories suggest the gig economy is replicatingโrather than resolvingโthe systemic vulnerabilities plaguing Pakistanโs broader labor market.
4 Discussion and Policy Implications
The findings reveal a systemic erosion of employment security that transcends cyclical economic fluctuations, pointing to structural deficiencies in Pakistanโs labor market governance. The inverse relationship between GDP growth and employment quality challenges conventional development paradigms that prioritize macroeconomic stability over labor market inclusivity.[10] This paradox suggests that growth-oriented policies alone cannot address precarity among the social periphery without targeted interventions to redistribute economic gains.
The projected intensification of automation, climate migration, and debt traps by 2025 necessitates urgent policy recalibration. Automation risks displacing 18-45% of workers in manufacturing and low-skill gig jobs according to Delphi projections, while climate-induced labor migration may swell urban informal settlements by 30%. These intersecting crises demand a three-pronged policy response: extending social protection to informal workers, creating adaptive safety nets for climate migrants, and regulating platform work to prevent algorithmic exploitation.
A viable policy framework must address implementation gaps in existing initiatives like the Sindh Home-Based Workers Act. Lessons from Brazilโs Unified Registry for Social Programs suggest that integrating informal workers into national databases through mobile registration drives could overcome coverage barriers.[11] Simultaneously, climate adaptation policies should incorporate labor market safeguards, such as wage insurance for displaced agrarian workers modeled after Bangladeshโs Climate Bridge Fund.[12]
The studyโs qualitative narratives reveal that precarity is not merely an economic condition but a lived experience of systemic exclusion. A national database documenting these experiences could inform advocacy efforts, as demonstrated by Indiaโs Working Peoplesโ Charter movement.[13] Such evidence-based advocacy must target the root causes of informality, including regressive taxation that incentivizes off-the-books employment and financial exclusion that perpetuates debt bondage.
Methodological constraints in this research, particularly the reliance on self-reported income data and the Delphi panelโs inherent subjectivity in forecasting, suggest avenues for future work. Longitudinal studies tracking the same workers through climate and economic shocks could yield more precise vulnerability assessments. Comparative research across South Asian labor markets may identify transferable policy solutions, while ethnographic work could unpack how religious and gender identities intersect with platform-mediated work.
The gig economyโs dual natureโas both an escape from traditional exploitation and a new vector of precarityโunderscores the need for regulatory innovation. Pakistan could pilot portable benefit systems tied to digital work histories, building on experiments in California and the EU.[14] Without such interventions, the convergence of automation, climate stress, and financialization threatens to deepen existing inequalities, leaving Pakistanโs social periphery increasingly vulnerable to systemic shocks.
5 Conclusion
This study has systematically documented the erosion of employment security among Pakistanโs social periphery from 2010 to 2025, revealing a widening โSecurity Gapโ between macroeconomic growth and labor market precarity. The findings demonstrate that informalization, climate shocks, and platform-mediated work have collectively destabilized livelihoods, with marginalized groupsโparticularly women, religious minorities, and climate-displaced workersโbearing disproportionate risks. The inverse relationship between GDP growth and employment quality challenges conventional development narratives, exposing systemic failures in redistributing economic gains. The research underscores the urgent need for policy frameworks that bridge this Security Gap through innovative social protections. Future studies should explore the longitudinal impacts of intersecting crises on intergenerational mobility, while policymakers must prioritize portable benefits for gig workers, climate-resilient labor markets, and gender-responsive social safety nets. Without such interventions, Pakistan risks institutionalizing precarity as a permanent feature of its labor landscape, with profound implications for social cohesion and sustainable development. The studyโs mixed-methods approach offers a template for analyzing employment security erosion in comparable contexts, emphasizing the value of integrating lived experiences with structural analysis.
[1] W Easterly, โThe Political Economy of Growth Without Development: A Case Study of Pakistan,โ Unable To Determine Complete Venue, 2001.
[2] M Imran, G Murtiza, and MS Akbar, โPolitical Instability in Pakistan: Challenges and Remedies,โ South Asian Studies, 2023.
[3] Z Imran, โClimate Change and Its Impact on the Political Dynamics of Pakistan,โ JSTOR, 2013.
[4] M McCartney, โThe China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Infrastructure, Social Savings, Spillovers, and Economic Growth in Pakistan,โ Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2022.
[5] MF Arby, MJ Malik, and MN Hanif, The Size of Informal Economy in Pakistan (mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de, 2010).
[6] KA Siegmann and H Majid, โEmpowering Growth in Pakistan?โ The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 2021.
[7] AY Grinberger and P Samuels, โModeling the Labor Market in the Aftermath of a Disaster: Two Perspectives,โ International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2018.
[8] M Hussain, S Anwar, and S Huang, โSocioeconomic and Demographic Factors Affecting Labor Force Participation in Pakistan,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2016.
[9] U Rani and M Furrer, โDigital Labour Platforms and New Forms of Flexible Work in Developing Countries: Algorithmic Management of Work and Workers,โ Competition & Change, 2021.
[10] R Khan and IS Chaudhry, โImpact of Human Capital on Employment and Economic Growth in Developing Countries,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2019.
[11] J Unni and U Rani, โSocial Protection for Informal Workers in India: Insecurities, Instruments and Institutional Mechanisms,โ Development and Change, 2003.
[12] J Draper, โLabor Migration and Climate Change Adaptation,โ American Political Science Review, 2022.
[13] K Kolben, โLabor Rights as Human Rights,โ Va. J. Intโl L., 2009.
[14] N Foster, G Nelson, and L Reder, โPortable Benefits Resource Guide,โ The Aspen Institute (July 13), 2016.
This case study investigates the nexus between climate-induced displacement and security in South Asia, challenging conventional border-centric security paradigms. We analyze how environmental stressorsโcoastal erosion, river flooding, and glacial meltโgenerate displacement patterns that transcend national boundaries, thereby reshaping regional security dynamics. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining empirical case studies with policy analysis to interrogate the inadequacies of state-centric security models. Findings reveal that climate displacement often manifests as irregular cross-border migration or internal instability, with exclusionary border policies exacerbating human vulnerability while failing to address root causes. For example, coastal erosion displaces agrarian communities, forcing irregular migration that receiving states frame as a security threat, thereby intensifying border militarization. Moreover, internal displacement due to river flooding strains urban infrastructure, creating secondary security risks through resource competition and social friction. The study further identifies glacial melt as a catalyst for interstate tensions over shared water resources, highlighting how environmental degradation escalates geopolitical strain. Critically, the research argues that rigid border control frameworks are ill-suited to address climate-driven mobility, proposing instead adaptive strategies that recognize migration as an adaptation mechanism. Policy implications emphasize regional cooperation, resilience-based urban planning, and the integration of climate change into security discourse. The study contributes to broader debates on non-traditional security threats by demonstrating how climate displacement blurs the distinction between internal and external security, necessitating transformative governance approaches in South Asia and beyond.
The intersection of climate change and security has emerged as a critical area of inquiry, particularly in regions where environmental stressors intersect with preexisting socioeconomic vulnerabilities. South Asia, characterized by dense populations, agrarian economies, and transboundary ecological systems, exemplifies this convergence. Existing literature frames climate-induced displacement as a โthreat multiplier,โ[1] amplifying instability through resource scarcity, forced migration, and geopolitical friction. However, traditional security paradigms remain anchored in state-centric models that prioritize territorial sovereignty over adaptive governance, a gap this research seeks to address.
The contribution of this study lies in its systematic examination of how climate displacement reconfigures security dynamics in South Asia. While prior work has explored regional climate-security linkages,[2] few studies interrogate the role of borders as contested sites where environmental and security imperatives collide. We advance this discourse by demonstrating how rigid border frameworks exacerbate human insecurity while failing to mitigate displacement drivers. For example, coastal erosion in deltaic regions displaces communities whose cross-border movement is criminalized, transforming a climate adaptation strategy into a perceived security threat.[3]
This research is guided by three key questions: (1) How do climate stressors generate displacement patterns with cross-border security implications? (2) What institutional blind spots prevent effective responses to climate-driven mobility? (3) How might border management evolve to address these challenges? The objective is to critique exclusionary security models and propose cooperative frameworks that reconcile mobility with stability.
The study builds on foundational work linking climate change to transnational security threats,[4] yet diverges by centering South Asiaโs unique geopolitical context. Here, shared river systems and densely populated low-lying coasts create displacement pathways that transcend national boundaries. Recent analyses highlight how glacial melt and erratic monsoon patterns intensify these dynamics,[5] but few integrate these insights with border governance critiques.
The following cases illustrate how climate stressors in South Asia generate distinct displacement patterns, each with unique implications for regional security. These examples highlight the inadequacy of conventional border frameworks in addressing environmental mobility.
Deltaic regions such as the Sundarbans and the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna basin face accelerating land loss due to rising sea levels and intensified cyclonic activity. Saline intrusion renders agricultural land unproductive, displacing communities reliant on subsistence farming. Initial displacement is often internal, with affected populations relocating to urban peripheries. However, diminishing livelihood opportunities in overcrowded cities eventually push migrants toward international borders. For instance, displaced farmers from Bangladeshโs coastal zones increasingly cross into Indiaโs northeastern states, where porous borders and informal labor markets facilitate irregular entry. State responses typically frame such movement as illegal migration, triggering heightened surveillance and securitization of border zones. This dynamic transforms climate refugees into perceived security threats, reinforcing exclusionary policies that neglect the environmental drivers of displacement.
The Indus, Ganges, and Brahmaputra river systems exhibit heightened hydrological volatility, with monsoon rains causing recurrent, large-scale flooding. Annual displacements number in the millions, predominantly within national boundaries. For example, Pakistanโs 2022 floods displaced over 7 million people, many of whom relocated to Karachi and Hyderabad. Such inflows strain urban infrastructure, leading to the rapid expansion of informal settlements in flood-prone areas. Competition for housing, water, and employment exacerbates tensions between host communities and displaced groups, occasionally escalating into localized violence. Municipal authorities, already grappling with inadequate resources, struggle to manage these pressures, creating governance vacuums that non-state actors may exploit. Unlike cross-border displacement, this internal movement generates indirect security risks by eroding social cohesion and institutional capacity.
The Hindu Kush Himalaya, which feeds South Asiaโs major rivers, is experiencing glacial retreat at twice the global average rate. Downstream effects include short-term flood risks and long-term water scarcity, disrupting agrarian economies in northern India, Nepal, and Pakistan. Communities dependent on glacial meltwater for irrigation face livelihood collapse, prompting migration to urban centers or across borders. Simultaneously, dwindling water availability intensifies interstate competition over shared resources, particularly between India and Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty. This dual dynamicโlocal displacement and geopolitical strainโredefines borders as arenas of environmental conflict. Unlike traditional territorial disputes, these tensions stem from ecological interdependence, challenging security institutions to address non-military threats.
These cases collectively demonstrate how climate displacement erodes the distinction between internal and external security. Coastal erosion and glacial melt generate cross-border pressures, while river flooding destabilizes domestic governance structures. All three scenarios reveal the limitations of reactive border control in mitigating climate-driven mobility.
The analysis of climate-induced displacement in South Asia reveals complex security challenges that transcend traditional state-centric frameworks, necessitating a reevaluation of existing governance approaches. The following sections explore these dynamics through legal, urban, environmental, and geopolitical lenses, highlighting the urgent need for adaptive and cooperative solutions.
The absence of formal legal recognition for climate-displaced populations creates a protection gap that exacerbates human insecurity while generating new security dilemmas. Unlike refugees fleeing persecution under the 1951 Refugee Convention,[6] those displaced by environmental factors lack guaranteed rights to asylum or non-refoulement. This legal vacuum forces affected individuals into irregular migration channels, where they become vulnerable to exploitation and border criminalization. For example, Bangladeshi farmers displaced by saline intrusion often cross into India without documentation, where they face detention or deportation.[7]
Security institutions frequently respond to such movements with exclusionary measures rather than adaptive strategies. Border militarization in Indiaโs northeastern states illustrates this trend, where fencing and increased patrols aim to deter irregular crossings but fail to address the underlying environmental drivers.[8] This securitization of climate mobility transforms humanitarian needs into perceived threats, reinforcing a cycle of vulnerability and repression. The Sundarbans region exemplifies this tension, as displaced communities navigating mangrove forests are framed as โillegal infiltratorsโ rather than victims of ecological collapse.[9]
Humanitarian-Security Collisions: Border zones become arenas where competing narratives of protection and sovereignty collide. While humanitarian actors advocate for safe migration corridors, security agencies prioritize territorial control, often disregarding the inevitability of climate-driven movement. This dichotomy is evident in the Bengal delta, where naval patrols intercept boats carrying displaced families, treating them as potential security risks rather than climate refugees.[10] Such responses contravene emerging norms on human mobility in climate change frameworks like the Global Compact for Migration.[11]
Legal Innovation Gaps: Existing international law remains ill-equipped to address cross-border climate displacement. The 2015 Paris Agreement acknowledges displacement risks but avoids binding commitments.[12] Regional initiatives like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) have similarly failed to institutionalize protection mechanisms, despite repeated calls for a coordinated approach.[13] This legal stagnation perpetuates ad hoc responses that prioritize short-term containment over long-term adaptation.
Normative Tensions: The securitization of climate migration reflects deeper contradictions in how states perceive environmental mobility. While climate adaptation policies increasingly recognize planned relocation as a strategy, cross-border movement remains stigmatized as a security threat.[14] This paradox underscores the need for legal frameworks that decouple climate displacement from criminality, potentially through regional agreements or amendments to refugee law. The Nansen Initiativeโs Protection Agenda offers a template for such reforms, though its implementation in South Asia remains limited.[15]
The legal and security challenges examined here reveal systemic failures in addressing climate displacement as a structural rather than exceptional phenomenon. Without formal recognition of environmental mobility rights, states will continue to deploy exclusionary measures that heighten human vulnerability while failing to mitigate displacement drivers. This impasse demands innovative governance models that reconcile sovereignty with ecological interdependence.
The cascading effects of climate-induced internal displacement create profound urban security challenges that existing governance structures struggle to address. As rural populations flee environmental degradation, secondary cities across South Asia absorb disproportionate inflows, with Karachi, Dhaka, and Kathmandu experiencing particularly acute pressures. These urban centers, already burdened by inadequate infrastructure and weak institutional capacity, become sites of compounded vulnerability where environmental and social risks intersect.
Infrastructure Strain and Spatial Fragmentation: Unplanned settlements proliferate in hazardous zones such as floodplains or unstable hillsides, as displaced populations seek affordable shelter. In Dhaka, climate migrants constitute over 70% of slum dwellers, with many residing in areas prone to waterlogging and disease outbreaks.[16] This spatial segregation exacerbates inequality, as informal settlements lack access to clean water, sanitation, and emergency services. Municipal authorities often view these enclaves through a security lens, conducting periodic evictions that displace communities anew rather than addressing root causes.[17]
Resource Competition and Social Friction: The rapid influx of displaced populations intensifies competition for scarce urban resources, particularly water and housing. In Karachi, climate migrants from Sindhโs drought-affected regions compete with long-term residents for access to tanker water supplies, with conflicts frequently escalating into ethnic violence.[18] Such tensions reveal how environmental stress translates into social instability, particularly in cities with preexisting ethnic or political divisions. Governance failures amplify these effects, as weak land-use planning and corrupt allocation systems privilege powerful actors over vulnerable groups.[19]
Gendered Dimensions of Urban Insecurity: Women and girls face heightened risks in displacement-affected urban areas, with limited access to safe housing and increased exposure to gender-based violence. In Nepalโs Tarai region, flooding displaces entire households to urban peripheries where women experience restricted mobility and reduced livelihood opportunities.[20] These patterns underscore how climate migration reinforces existing inequalities, creating new security challenges that transcend traditional law-and-order frameworks.
Institutional Capacity Gaps: Local governments lack both the resources and the mandate to address climate displacement systematically. Urban planning documents rarely account for climate migration projections, while disaster management agencies focus on immediate relief rather than long-term integration.[21] This institutional mismatch is evident in Hyderabad, where post-flood resettlement programs have displaced communities to peripheral zones without livelihood options, perpetuating cycles of poverty and instability.[22]
Non-State Actor Proliferation: Governance vacuums in displacement-affected urban areas create opportunities for non-state actors to assume service provision roles. In Karachiโs Orangi Township, militant groups have capitalized on water shortages to build parallel governance structures, further eroding state authority.[23] Such dynamics demonstrate how climate-induced internal displacement can indirectly facilitate armed group recruitment and territorial control.
The urban security challenges examined here reveal a fundamental disconnect between climate adaptation and urban governance. Current approaches treat displacement as a temporary humanitarian crisis rather than a permanent feature of South Asiaโs urban future. Addressing this gap requires transformative planning frameworks that anticipate migration flows, allocate resources equitably, and integrate displaced populations into urban systems. Without such reforms, secondary cities will remain pressure points where environmental and social instability converge.
The accelerating pace of environmental degradation in South Asia is reshaping interstate relations, with shared ecological systems becoming focal points for geopolitical competition. Unlike traditional security threats rooted in territorial disputes, these tensions emerge from the mismanagement of transboundary resources under climate stress, creating complex challenges that conventional diplomacy struggles to address.
Water Scarcity as a Conflict Multiplier: The Hindu Kush Himalayan glaciers, which feed South Asiaโs major river systems, are retreating at unprecedented rates, altering water availability downstream. This phenomenon creates a paradox of simultaneous flood risks and long-term water scarcity, with profound implications for agrarian economies. The Indus River system exemplifies this tension, where reduced glacial meltwater intensifies competition between India and Pakistan under the strained Indus Waters Treaty framework.[24] Monitoring stations along the Chenab River have recorded 19% declines in dry-season flows since 2000, exacerbating irrigation shortages in Pakistanโs Punjab region while increasing Indiaโs hydroelectric dam construction.[25] Such developments transform hydrological changes into political flashpoints, as seen in the 2019 Pulwama crisis where water disputes compounded broader hostilities.[26]
Borderlands as Ecological Hotspots: Environmental stress concentrates disproportionately in border regions, where governance gaps and competing jurisdictional claims hinder coordinated responses. The Sundarbans mangrove forest, straddling India and Bangladesh, illustrates how ecosystem collapse can escalate bilateral friction. As rising salinity destroys freshwater supplies, both countries have militarized forest patrols to prevent cross-border resource extraction, framing environmental adaptation strategies as security threats.[27] Satellite imagery reveals a 37% increase in border outposts since 2015, coinciding with declining fish stocks that previously sustained local communities.[28] This securitization of ecological management undermines traditional conservation approaches, replacing community-based resource sharing with exclusionary enforcement.
Climate Diplomacy Limitations: Existing regional institutions lack mechanisms to address environment-driven tensions. SAARCโs 2010 Thimphu Statement on Climate Change recognized shared vulnerabilities but failed to establish binding cooperation frameworks.[29] Subsequent initiatives like the Bangladesh-Bhutan-India-Nepal (BBIN) Motor Vehicles Agreement prioritized economic integration over ecological interdependence, overlooking how transportation corridors intersect with fragile watersheds.[30] This institutional gap becomes critical as glacial melt alters river courses, potentially invalidating existing boundary demarcations along the India-China Line of Actual Control.[31]
Non-Traditional Security Paradigms: The evolving nature of climate-driven tensions demands reconceptualization of security institutions. Military strategists increasingly identify water scarcity as a โthreat multiplierโ in defense assessments, yet operational responses remain focused on border hardening rather than adaptive governance.[32] The 2021 Indian Army Doctrine notably incorporated climate change risks but maintained traditional territorial defense postures, illustrating the conceptual lag in addressing environmental security challenges.[33]
Data Gaps and Monitoring Challenges: Asymmetric information flows exacerbate interstate distrust, particularly regarding shared water resources.[34] Similarly, Pakistanโs objections to Indian hydroelectric projects stem partly from inadequate technical consultations under the Indus Treatyโs conflict resolution mechanisms.[35]
The environmental change-interstate tension nexus reveals fundamental flaws in South Asiaโs security architecture. By treating ecological interdependence as a zero-sum competition rather than a shared challenge, states perpetuate cycles of mistrust that undermine regional stability. Addressing this requires innovative diplomacy that prioritizes joint monitoring systems, adaptive water-sharing agreements, and the demilitarization of conservation zones. Without such reforms, climate change will continue to erode the foundations of interstate cooperation in this strategically vital region.
The cumulative effects of climate-induced displacement are fundamentally altering South Asiaโs security architecture, eroding traditional distinctions between internal and external threats while exposing the limitations of state-centric response mechanisms. As demonstrated by the case studies, environmental stressors generate displacement patterns that simultaneously challenge domestic governance structures and cross-border stability frameworks, creating complex security dilemmas that defy conventional categorization.
Blurring of Security Domains: The conventional separation between internal security (maintaining law and order) and external security (border defense) becomes increasingly untenable as climate displacement creates hybrid threats. For instance, coastal erosion in Bangladesh generates cross-border migration that Indian security forces treat as an external threat, while simultaneously straining West Bengalโs internal capacity to manage population inflows.[36] This convergence is particularly evident in border regions like Assam, where climate migrants are framed as both โillegal infiltratorsโ and catalysts for local resource conflicts.[37] Security institutions, structured around rigid jurisdictional divisions, struggle to address these interconnected challenges through singular operational paradigms.
Non-Linear Threat Escalation: Unlike traditional security threats with identifiable actors and clear escalation pathways, climate displacement generates diffuse risks that propagate through social and economic systems. The 2022 Pakistan floods exemplify this dynamic, where initial displacement triggered secondary security effects including urban unrest, healthcare system collapse, and armed group recruitment in Balochistan.[38] Such cascading impacts reveal how environmental shocks can bypass conventional early warning systems, overwhelming institutional response capacities before threats are fully recognized.
Sovereignty Paradoxes: Climate displacement exposes contradictions in how states exercise territorial control. While governments assert sovereignty through border hardening (e.g., Indiaโs border fencing with Bangladesh), they simultaneously fail to protect populations within their borders from climate impacts.[39] This creates a perverse dynamic where states invest more in excluding displaced people than in preventing the conditions that force displacement. The Sundarbans region illustrates this tension, as both India and Bangladesh prioritize border patrols over mangrove conservation, despite the latter being more effective at preventing climate-driven migration.[40]
Human Security Erosion: Traditional security frameworks prioritize state stability over individual wellbeing, often exacerbating vulnerabilities for displaced populations. In Nepalโs Himalayan regions, glacial retreat has displaced herding communities who face arrest when crossing international borders for pasture, despite having no alternative livelihood options.[41] This criminalization of survival strategies reveals how rigid security approaches can undermine the very populations they purport to protect.
Institutional Adaptation Gaps: Security sector institutions remain poorly equipped to address the temporal dimensions of climate displacement. Unlike sudden conflict-induced displacement, climate migration often occurs gradually, allowing policymakers to defer action until crises erupt. The Ganges-Brahmaputra delta has seen salinity intrusion displace communities over decades, yet regional security planning continues to treat such movements as exceptional rather than inevitable.[42] This temporal mismatch between environmental change and institutional response creates persistent governance gaps.
Emerging Security Paradigms: Some security actors are beginning to recognize climate displacement as a structural rather than episodic challenge. The Bangladesh Armed Forcesโ inclusion of climate scenarios in military exercises represents tentative progress, though operational doctrine remains focused on traditional threats.[43] Similarly, Indiaโs National Disaster Management Authority has expanded its mandate to include climate migration planning, but lacks coordination with border security agencies.[44]
The transformation of South Asiaโs security landscape demands fundamental reevaluation of institutional priorities and operational frameworks. Climate displacement does not merely represent another security challenge to be added to existing agendasโit necessitates reimagining the very foundations of how security is conceptualized and implemented in an era of environmental breakdown. The following section explores how adaptive and cooperative approaches might address these systemic challenges.
The inadequacy of traditional border control mechanisms in addressing climate-induced displacement necessitates a paradigm shift toward adaptive governance models that recognize mobility as an essential adaptation strategy. Rigid border regimes predicated on exclusion and deterrence fail to account for the inevitability of climate-driven migration, often exacerbating human insecurity while doing little to mitigate underlying environmental stressors. Emerging research demonstrates that flexible border management approaches yield superior outcomes in regions experiencing climate displacement pressures.[45]
Mobility as Adaptation: Empirical evidence from South Asiaโs climate hotspots reveals that migration frequently serves as a rational response to environmental degradation rather than a security threat. In the Bengal delta, seasonal labor migration patterns have long functioned as a coping mechanism for agricultural disruptions caused by salinity intrusion.[46] However, contemporary border policies criminalize these traditional mobility pathways, forcing displaced populations into irregular channels that heighten vulnerability to exploitation. Recognizing migration as a legitimate adaptation strategy would require legal frameworks that permit temporary or circular movement across borders during environmental stress periods, similar to the ECOWAS protocol on free movement in West Africa.[47]
Regional Cooperation Mechanisms: Effective responses to climate displacement demand institutionalized cooperation that transcends bilateral tensions. The Himalayan river systems exemplify this imperative, where glacial melt affects multiple downstream states simultaneously. A potential model exists in the Mekong River Commissionโs data-sharing and joint planning mechanisms, which could be adapted to South Asian contexts despite geopolitical complexities.[48] SAARCโs dormant Climate Change Center could be revitalized to coordinate displacement forecasting and resource allocation, moving beyond its current limited role in information exchange.[49]
Integrated Early Warning Systems: Technological advancements enable more sophisticated prediction of displacement triggers, yet these tools remain disconnected from border management strategies. Satellite monitoring of coastal erosion in the Sundarbans, for instance, provides 12-18 month lead times on potential displacement events, but this data rarely informs border security preparations.[50] Linking such systems to adaptive border protocols could enable preemptive humanitarian corridors or temporary protection arrangements, reducing chaotic migration scenarios that often trigger securitized responses.
Community-Based Border Governance: Top-down border enforcement frequently disregards local cross-border networks that have historically managed environmental variability. In the Thar Desert region straddling India and Pakistan, traditional pastoralist communities developed intricate water-sharing arrangements that contemporary border policies now disrupt.[51] Empowering local institutions to manage climate-driven mobility through community visa programs or cross-border resource cooperatives could mitigate tensions while preserving ecological knowledge.
Security Sector Reform: Border security agencies require retraining to distinguish between climate-displaced populations and conventional security threats. Pilot programs in Nepalโs border districts have shown promise by incorporating climate literacy into border guard training, reducing violent confrontations with displaced herders.[52] Such initiatives must be scaled regionally, with joint exercises simulating climate migration scenarios to build interoperability among South Asian security forces.
Legal Innovation Pathways: Existing international frameworks provide foundations for progressive reform. The Global Compact on Refugees explicitly references climate drivers of displacement, offering a normative basis for regional protection agreements.[53] Similarly, the Sendai Frameworkโs emphasis on cross-border disaster risk reduction could be operationalized through SAARC to address slow-onset climate impacts.[54]
Economic Integration Leverage: Climate displacement pressures create unexpected opportunities for deeper regional economic cooperation. The BBIN Motor Vehicles Agreement could be expanded to include provisions for labor mobility during climate shocks, pairing infrastructure development with adaptive migration pathways.[55] Such economic incentives may overcome political resistance to border flexibility, as seen in the EUโs visa facilitation policies for neighboring climate-vulnerable states.[56]
The transition from rigid border control to adaptive management requires confronting entrenched security paradigms that equate sovereignty with exclusion. South Asiaโs experience demonstrates that climate displacement cannot be stopped by physical barriers or punitive measuresโit can only be managed through cooperative frameworks that acknowledge ecological interdependence. While political obstacles remain substantial, the costs of inaction increasingly outweigh the risks of innovation in border governance. The regionโs future stability hinges on its ability to reimagine borders as dynamic interfaces for managing shared environmental challenges rather than static lines of defense against inevitable human mobility.
4 Conclusion
This study has demonstrated how climate-induced displacement in South Asia fundamentally challenges conventional security paradigms by blurring the boundaries between internal and external threats. The research reveals that environmental stressorsโcoastal erosion, river flooding, and glacial meltโgenerate complex displacement patterns that transcend national borders while simultaneously destabilizing domestic governance structures. A key contribution lies in exposing the limitations of state-centric security models that criminalize climate mobility rather than addressing its root causes. The findings underscore that rigid border control mechanisms not only fail to prevent displacement but often exacerbate human insecurity while neglecting the ecological interdependencies that drive regional instability. Looking ahead, the study highlights an urgent need for research that bridges the gap between climate adaptation and security policy. Future investigations should explore how regional institutions can operationalize adaptive border management in politically contested environments, particularly through joint early warning systems and community-based governance models. The broader implications suggest that South Asiaโs experience offers critical lessons for other climate-vulnerable regions, where environmental change is similarly reshaping security landscapes. Addressing these challenges requires moving beyond traditional notions of sovereignty to develop cooperative frameworks that recognize human mobility as an inevitable and necessary response to ecological transformation.
[1] HJ Schellnhuber, Climate Change as a Security Risk (api.taylorfrancis.com, 2010).
[3] R Karim and TA Jannati, โClimate-Induced Migration and Its Threat to National Security: Implications for Regional Stability and Geopolitics in South Asia,โ Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Geopolitics, 2025.
[4] C Jasparro and J Taylor, โClimate Change and Regional Vulnerability to Transnational Security Threats in Southeast Asia,โ Geopolitics, 2008.
[5] S Saeed, โThe Impact of Climate Change on Global Power Dynamics,โ International Journal of Policy Studies, 2024.
[6] J McAdam, โThe Enduring Relevance of the 1951 Refugee Convention,โ International Journal of Refugee Law, 2017.
[7] M Nevitt, โClimate Change and the Specter of Statelessness,โ Geo. Envโt L. Rev., 2022.
[8] HJ Shewly, โIntroduction: Migration, Power, and Security in South Asia,โ Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security, 2025.
[9] A Ghose and SM Ali, Displaced by Rising Tides: Legal Insights and Policy Imperatives for Climate Refugees in the Sundarbans Region of India (diamond-oa.lib.cam.ac.uk, 2024).
[10] R Chakraborty, โClimate Change and Maritime Security in the Bay of Bengal: A Case Study of Coastal Communities of West Bengal and Bangladesh,โ The Routledge Handbook of Maritime India, 2025.
[11] UNG Assembly, โGlobal Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration,โ International Journal of Refugee Law, 2018.
[12] C Ney, โMaking a Place for Climate-Impacted Displacement in the Paris Climate Accord,โ Lincoln Planning Review, 2017.
[13] ASMA Ullah, โRegional Organisations and Migration Governance in South Asia: Navigating Complexities Among SAARC Member Countries,โ Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Global Governance, 2025.
[14] NL Bonnett and SJ Birchall, โLocal Planning for Climate Induced Relocation: A Systematic Review,โ International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2025.
[15] J McAdam, โFrom the Nansen Initiative to the Platform on Disaster Displacement: Shaping International Approaches to Climate Change, Disasters and Displacement,โ UNSWLJ, 2016.
[16] N Adri, โClimate-Inducedโrural-Urban Migration in Bangladesh: Experience of Migrants in Dhaka City (academia.edu, 2015).
[17] SA Wahab and I Ashutosh, โRebordering South Asia: Displaced Persons and Urbanization,โ Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2022.
[18] HF Khan and SA Arshad, โBeyond Water Scarcity: Water (in) Security and Social Justice in Karachi,โ Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2022.
[19] N Anwar and M Sur, Climate Change, Urban Futures, and the Gendering of Cities in South Asia (opendocs.ids.ac.uk, 2021).
[20] S Shrestha, IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE INDUCED DISPLACEMENT FROM THE GENDER PERSPECTIVE IN DARCHULA DISTRICT, NEPAL (academia.edu, 2026).
[21] R Ahsan, S Karuppannan, and J Kellett, โClimate Migration and Urban Planning System: A Study of Bangladesh,โ Environmental Justice, 2011.
[22] E Orhan, โThe Consequences of Security Cognition in Post-Disaster Urban Planning Practices in the Case of Turkey,โ Natural Hazards, 2015.
[23] R Schweiger, โThe Role of Non-State Actors and Cities in Global Migration and Refugee Governance,โ IntechOpen, 2024.
[24] FU Haq, I Ahmad, and NM Khan, โClimate Change, Water Variability, and Cooperation Along Transboundary River Basins in Perspective of Indus Water Treaty,โ The Water, Climate, And Food Nexus, 2024.
[25] AK Biswas, โCooperation or Conflict in Transboundary Water Management: Case Study of South Asia,โ Asian Perspectives on Water Policy, 2013.
[26] MN Mirza, Indus Water Disputes and India-Pakistan Relations (archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de, 2016).
[27] K Hassan et al., โClimate Change and World Heritage: A Cross-Border Analysis of the Sundarbans (BangladeshโIndia),โ Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 2019.
[28] B Jackson et al., โRemote Sensing of Fish-Processing in the Sundarbans Reserve Forest, Bangladesh: An Insight into the Modern Slavery-Environment Nexus in the Coastal Fringe,โ Maritime Studies, 2020.
[29] MS Islam and E Kieu, โClimate Change and Food Security in SAARC,โ Climate Change And Food Security In Asia Pacific, 2021.
[30] P Pal, โIntra-BBIN Trade: Opportunities and Challenges,โ ORF Issue Brief, 2016.
[31] L Vemsani, โThe Himalayan Ranges, Glaciers, Lakes and Rivers: An International Ecological, Economic and Military Outlook,โ The Political Economy of Conflict in South Asia, 2015.
[32] AJ Tellis, โThe Changing Political-Military Environment: South Asia,โ Unable to Determine, 2001.
[33] D Jayaram, โThe Indian Military and Environmental Affairs: An Analysis Through the Lens of Military Change,โ Contemporary South Asia, 2020.
[34] A Barua, S Vij, and M Zulfiqur Rahman, โPowering or Sharing Water in the Brahmaputra River Basin,โ International Journal of Water Resources Development, 2018.
[35] WA Qureshi, โDispute Resolution Mechanisms: An Analysis of the Indus Waters Treaty,โ Pepp. Disp. Resol. LJ, 2018.
[36] R McLeman, โInternational Migration and Climate Adaptation in an Era of Hardening Borders,โ Nature Climate Change, 2019.
[37] S Sushil, Climate Change an Emerging Threat to Peace and Security in Assam (North-East India): A Political Ecology Approach (etheses.whiterose.ac.uk, 2024).
[38] HB Waseem and IA Rana, โFloods in Pakistan: A State-of-the-Art Review,โ Natural Hazards Research, 2023.
[39] S Dalby, โBordering Sustainability in the Anthropocene,โ Territory, Politics, Governance, 2020.
[40] J Vivekanandan, โScratches on Our Sovereignty?: Analyzing Conservation Politics in the Sundarbans,โ Regions and Cohesion, 2021.
[41] P Gentle and R Thwaites, โTranshumant Pastoralism in the Context of Socioeconomic and Climate Change in the Mountains of Nepal,โ Mountain Research and Development, 2016.
[42] D Lund, โNavigating Slow-Onset Risks Through Foresight and Flexibility in Fiji: Emerging Recommendations for the Planned Relocation of Climate-Vulnerable Communities,โ Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2021.
[43] LCK Akbar, โClimate Change and Bangladesh: Role of Military in Pursuing Non-Military Security Interests,โ NDC E-JOURNAL, 2015.
[44] D Gupta et al., โClimate-Induced Migration in India and Bangladesh: A Systematic Review of Drivers, Impacts, and Adaptation Mechanisms,โ Climate, 2025.
[45] McLeman, โInternational Migration and Climate Adaptation in an Era of Hardening Borders.โ
[46] T Siddiqui et al., Accommodating Migration in Climate Change Adaptation: A GBM Delta Bangladesh Perspective (idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org, 2018).
[47] EO Ochoga, GU Osimen, and IE Pokubo, โAssessing the Security Implications of the ECOWAS Protocol on Free Movement in Nigeria,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2025.
[48] D Li, J Zhao, and RS Govindaraju, โWater Benefits Sharing Under Transboundary Cooperation in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin,โ Journal of Hydrology, 2019.
[49] RK Singh and M Kumar, โAssessing Vulnerability of Agriculture System to Climate Change in the SAARC Region,โ Environmental Challenges, 2021.
[50] E Hossain et al., โBig Data and Migration Forecasting: Predictive Insights into Displacement Patterns Triggered by Climate Change and Armed Conflict,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2023.
[51] G Rodriguez, Borderland Empires: An Indigenous Phenomenon (search.proquest.com, 2025).
[52] McLeman, โInternational Migration and Climate Adaptation in an Era of Hardening Borders.โ
[53] TA Aleinikoff, โThe Unfinished Work of the Global Compact on Refugees,โ International Journal of Refugee Law, 2018.
[54] D Kanteler and I Bakouros, โA Collaborative Framework for Cross-Border Disaster Management in the Balkans,โ International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2024.
[55] E Weber, โTrade Agreements, Labour Mobility and Climate Change in the Pacific Islands,โ Regional Environmental Change, 2017.
[56] D Butros, VB Gyberg, and A Kaijser, โSolidarity Versus Security: Exploring Perspectives on Climate Induced Migration in UN and EU Policy,โ Environmental Communication, 2021.
When you hear the word “security,” what comes to mind?
For most students, the image is clear: Soldiers at a border. Tanks on a parade. Spy satellites in space. Presidents signing treaties.
This is the traditional view of security. It is not wrong. But it is incomplete.
Imagine a mother in rural Sindh. Her worry is not a foreign army. Her worry is the tube well that has run dry. Her worry is the price of flour. Her worry is whether her daughter can walk to school without fear.
Is this not security? If her water runs out, her family cannot survive. If her daughter is unsafe, her community loses its future. Yet, in most university textbooks, these worries are called “social issues,” not “security issues.”
This is what we mean when we talk about decolonizing security studies. It is not about burning books or rejecting all Western ideas. It is about widening the lens. It is about asking: Whose security counts? And who gets to decide?
As students in Pakistan and the Global South, you are standing at a unique crossroads. You are learning theories written in London and Washington, but you are living realities in Lahore and Karachi. This guide is here to help you bridge that gap.
What Is “Decolonizing”?
Let us keep this simple. To “colonize” means to take over. For a long time, Western powers took over land, resources, and also ideas.
In security studies, this means the questions we ask are often the questions Western powers care about. They care about nuclear weapons, international terrorism, and trade routes. So, universities teach these as the most important topics.
To “decolonize” means to bring other questions back to the table. It means saying: Water security is just as important as nuclear security.Women’s safety is just as important as border safety.
It does not mean ignoring the army or the government. It means recognizing that a state can have a strong army but still be insecure if its people are hungry or fearful.
The Western Default: What You Need to Know
Most standard International Relations (IR) textbooks rely on something called “Realism.” This theory says the world is dangerous, and the only thing that matters is state power.
This theory was built during the Cold War, mostly by men in Europe and America. It worked for explaining why the US and USSR did not fight directly. But does it explain why a flood in Pakistan can displace millions? Does it explain how climate change fuels conflict in Africa?
Not really.
When you study security using only this default setting, you miss half the picture. You might understand why two countries are arguing, but you will not understand why the people living between them are suffering.
As we discussed in our mission piece, Why ‘Beyond Western Frames’ Matters in 2026, relying on one manual for a different car leads to breakdowns. The same is true for security theory.
A Toolkit: Three Questions to Ask
So, how do you start decolonizing your own thinking? You do not need to wait for a new textbook. You can start with your next assignment.
Whenever you read a security analysisโor write oneโask these three questions:
1. Who is being secured? Is the article talking about protecting the government’s power? Or is it talking about protecting the people’s lives? Sometimes these match. Often, they do not.
2. What is the threat? Is the threat only a foreign enemy? Or could the threat be disease, poverty, or environmental collapse? In 2026, a virus or a heatwave can kill more people than a bullet.
3. Whose voice is missing? Look at the sources. Are all the experts men? Are they all from big cities? Are they all from powerful countries? If yes, the analysis is likely missing something crucial.
Why This Matters for Pakistan
You might wonder: This sounds philosophical. How does it help me in Pakistan?
It helps because it changes how we solve problems.
For decades, Pakistan’s security debate has been dominated by traditional views. Heavy focus on borders, military strength, and geopolitical alliances. These are vital. But look at the challenges we face today.
Climate Security: The 2022 floods showed us that water is a security threat. A decolonized approach puts climate adaptation at the center of national security policy, not just the environment ministry.
Human Security: When young people cannot find jobs, they become vulnerable to extremism. A decolonized approach sees economic opportunity as a security strategy, not just an economic one.
Gender Security: When women are unsafe in public spaces, half the population cannot contribute fully to society. A decolonized approach sees gender equality as a national security priority.
By widening the definition, we do not weaken the state. We strengthen it. A state is only as secure as its most vulnerable citizen.
Moving Forward: You Are the Researcher
Decolonizing security studies is not just for professors. It is for you.
You have access to information your grandparents could not imagine. You can talk to farmers about water. You can interview shopkeepers about inflation. You can look at data that was once secret.
Do not just repeat what the textbooks say. Test them against your reality.
If a theory says states are the only important actors, but you see NGOs saving lives during a disaster, note that. If a report says a region is “unsafe” because of militants, but locals say they feel safe because of community councils, write that down.
Your perspective is not “lesser” because it is local. It is essential because it is real.
Join the Discussion
At Presser Review, we want to hear your voice. We are building a library of knowledge that reflects our realities, not just imported theories.
Read More: Check out our third flagship piece on Climate Data and Local Knowledge.
Write for Us: Are you a student? Send us your essays. We want to publish your critical thinking.
Share: Discuss this with your classmates. Ask them: What does security mean to you?
The world is changing. The old maps are fading. It is time for us to draw new ones.
๐ก Why This Matters
Traditional View
Decolonized View
Focus: State Borders & Military
Focus: People & Communities
Threats: Foreign Armies, Terrorists
Threats: Climate, Poverty, Disease
Experts: Generals, Diplomats
Experts: Locals, Women, Youth
Goal: Protect the Government
Goal: Protect the Human Dignity
Understanding this difference helps you analyze news and policy with a sharper, more realistic eye.
This study examines the role of Pakistani women police officers in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping missions, focusing on their contributions to national image projection, gender dynamics, and societal perceptions. We employ a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative interviews with quantitative analysis, to explore the experiences and perspectives of eleven purposively sampled female officers deployed in UN operations. The results reveal a statistically significant association between support for womenโs participation and the belief that it enhances Pakistanโs soft power, with 85.71% of respondents endorsing their involvement. However, neutral responses dominated questions related to gender progress and public trust, indicating nuanced or unresolved societal attitudes. Qualitative findings highlight the officersโ resilience and diplomatic impact, underscoring their transformative potential in peacekeeping contexts. The study contributes to the discourse on gender-inclusive security strategies by demonstrating how female participation in UN missions can reshape national narratives while exposing gaps in broader societal acceptance. Moreover, it provides empirical evidence for policymakers to advocate for increased representation of women in peace operations, though further research is needed to address lingering ambiguities in public perceptions. These insights are particularly relevant for countries like Pakistan, where gender roles in law enforcement remain contested yet increasingly visible on the global stage.
United Nations peace operations have evolved into complex mechanisms for maintaining international security and promoting human rights.[1] Within this framework, the role of women in peacekeeping has gained prominence, particularly in addressing gender-specific challenges in conflict zones.[2] Pakistan, as one of the largest contributors to UN peacekeeping missions, presents a unique case study due to its increasing deployment of female police officers in these operations.[3] This study investigates how their participation influences Pakistanโs international image, advances gender equality, and shapes domestic perceptions of women in law enforcement.
The integration of women into peacekeeping aligns with broader UN initiatives to enhance operational effectiveness through gender-sensitive approaches.[4] Research suggests that female officers improve community engagement, particularly in societies where cultural norms restrict male-female interactions.[5] However, the specific contributions of Pakistani women in this context remain underexplored, despite their growing presence in missions such as those in Liberia and South Sudan.[6] This gap is critical given Pakistanโs dual status as a major peacekeeping contributor and a society with evolving gender norms in policing.[7]
The primary objective of this research is to analyze how Pakistani women police officers perceive their role in UN missions and how their participation affects three interconnected dimensions: (1) Pakistanโs soft power projection, (2) gender progress within law enforcement, and (3) public trust in female officers. The study hypothesizes that their deployment strengthens diplomatic ties, challenges traditional gender roles, and fosters societal acceptance of women in security sectors. These assumptions are tested through a mixed-methods design that captures both statistical trends and narrative experiences.[8]
This research contributes to existing literature in two key ways. First, it provides empirical evidence on how gender-inclusive peacekeeping operates in practice, moving beyond theoretical frameworks.[9] Second, it examines the bidirectional impact of such deploymentsโboth on host communities and the officersโ home institutionsโa perspective often overlooked in studies focused solely on mission outcomes.[10] The findings have implications for policymakers aiming to balance operational demands with transformative gender agendas.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 details the mixed-methods methodology, Section 3 presents quantitative and qualitative results, Section 4 discusses their implications for theory and practice, and Section 5 concludes with recommendations for future research and policy. By bridging the gap between international peacekeeping norms and local gender dynamics, this study offers a nuanced understanding of how women from traditionally conservative policing systems navigate and reshape global security paradigms.
This study employed a mixed-methods research design to comprehensively examine the role of Pakistani women police officers in UN peacekeeping missions. The methodological framework integrated qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with quantitative analysis of response patterns, allowing for triangulation of findings.
2.1 Participant Selection and Sampling
The research team employed purposive sampling to select eleven Pakistani police officers with direct experience in UN peacekeeping operations. The sample included representatives from three hierarchical levels: Deputy Superintendents (n=4), Assistant Sub-Inspectors (n=3), and Senior Patrol Officers (n=4). This stratification ensured representation across operational and command roles, capturing diverse perspectives on peacekeeping experiences. Participants were recruited through official channels of Pakistanโs police service, with selection criteria requiring at least one completed UN mission deployment.
2.2 Data Collection Instruments
A semi-structured interview protocol was developed, consisting of five core questions (Table 1) designed to assess perceptions across three thematic areas: national image projection, gender progress, and public trust. The instrument underwent pilot testing with two retired female officers to refine question clarity and cultural appropriateness.
Table 1. Interview Questions and Corresponding Themes
Question
Thematic Focus
Response Scale
1. Should Pakistani women participate in peacekeeping?
Participation norms
Agree/Neutral/Disagree
2. Does participation improve Pakistanโs image?
National diplomacy
Agree/Neutral/Disagree
3. Does international service advance gender progress?
Societal impact
Agree/Neutral/Disagree
4. Do civilians prefer female officers?
Public trust
Agree/Neutral/Disagree
5. Would you serve again?
Personal commitment
Yes/No/Uncertain
Interviews were conducted in Urdu and English, averaging 45 minutes in duration. All sessions were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and translated where necessary while preserving linguistic nuances.
2.3 Analytical Framework
Quantitative data from closed-ended questions were coded into a three-point scale (Agree=1, Neutral=0, Disagree=-1) and analyzed using chi-square tests. The statistical model examined associations between variables through the equation:
where represents observed frequencies and expected frequencies under independence. Effect sizes were calculated using Cramรฉrโs V to determine practical significance beyond statistical thresholds.
For qualitative analysis, transcripts underwent thematic coding via NVivo software. An iterative process identified emergent patterns through open coding (initial categorization), axial coding (relationship mapping), and selective coding (core theme integration). Inter-coder reliability reached 0.82 (Cohenโs ฮบ), ensuring analytical rigor.
2.4 Ethical Considerations
The study adhered to Declaration of Helsinki guidelines, obtaining approval from the institutional review board of [Blinded Institution]. Participants received written and verbal explanations of research objectives, with signed consent forms ensuring voluntary participation. All identifiers were removed during data processing, with pseudonyms (e.g., PO-1, PO-2) used in reporting.
The methodological approach addressed limitations through several safeguards:
Sample diversity: Stratification by rank mitigated hierarchical bias
Instrument validation: Pilot testing enhanced question specificity
Analytical transparency: Dual coding and statistical verification reduced interpretation bias
This robust design enabled comprehensive examination of both measurable trends and contextual narratives surrounding womenโs peacekeeping roles. The integration of methods provided complementary insights, where quantitative results established general patterns and qualitative data elucidated their operational and social dimensions.
3 Results
The findings present a multifaceted view of Pakistani women police officersโ experiences in UN peacekeeping, revealing both strong consensus on certain issues and nuanced perspectives on others. Quantitative results highlight statistically significant patterns, while qualitative insights provide depth to these trends, offering a comprehensive understanding of their roles and impacts.
The chi-square analysis revealed a robust association between respondentsโ support for Pakistani womenโs participation in peacekeeping missions and their perception of national image benefits . This statistically significant relationship indicates that officers who endorsed female participation overwhelmingly viewed it as enhancing Pakistanโs soft power projection. As illustrated in Figure 1, 85.71% of respondents agreed that women should join UN missions, with none expressing disagreement across all surveyed topics.
Figure 1. Distribution of responses to five questions on Pakistani womenโs participation in UN peacekeeping missions and related perceptions on a 3-point Likert scale
Operational Impact: Qualitative data contextualized these findings, with participants describing how their presence altered host communitiesโ perceptions of Pakistan. One Deputy Superintendent noted: โLocal women in [mission country] saw our uniforms and asked if Pakistan allowed female officers. Our visibility became a diplomatic toolโ [PO-3]. This aligns with theoretical frameworks positing that gender-diverse peacekeeping forces enhance mission legitimacy.[11]
Image Projection Mechanisms: Three primary pathways emerged through which participation influenced national image:
Symbolic Representation: Uniformed women serving as visual markers of Pakistanโs progressive policies
Operational Competence: Demonstrated effectiveness in community policing challenging stereotypes
Cross-cultural Exchange: Personal interactions reshaping international perceptions of Pakistani society
The strength of the quantitative association ( , indicating perfect correlation in this sample) suggests that support for participation and image enhancement are mutually reinforcing constructs among deployed officers. However, the small sample size warrants caution in generalizing these effects to broader populations.
Comparative Context: These findings extend prior research on gender and peacekeeping[12] by demonstrating how participation metrics correlate with perceptual outcomes. The absence of negative responses contrasts with studies documenting resistance to female officers in some conservative policing cultures,[13] suggesting that UN service may foster more progressive attitudes among participants themselves.
Limitations: While the statistical significance is robust, the dichotomous nature of responses (Agree/Neutral) limits granularity in assessing intensity of beliefs. Future research could employ continuous scales to capture more nuanced variations in perception strength. Nevertheless, these results provide empirical support for policy initiatives linking womenโs peacekeeping roles to diplomatic objectives.
The consistency between quantitative and qualitative data underscores the transformative potential of female participation, both for individual officers and national reputation-building. As one Assistant Sub-Inspector summarized: โWe werenโt just keeping peaceโwe were changing what people thought possible for Pakistani womenโ [PO-7]. This dual impact highlights the strategic value of gender-inclusive deployments in contemporary peace operations.
While the study identified strong consensus regarding womenโs participation in peacekeeping and its diplomatic benefits, analysis revealed no statistically significant association between these factors and perceptions of gender progress within law enforcement. The chi-square test for the relationship between support for womenโs role (Question 3) and beliefs about their contribution to awareness and advancement yielded , indicating that these variables operate independently within the sampled population.
Response Distribution Patterns: As shown in Figure 1, while 66.67% of respondents agreed that womenโs participation in UN missions advances gender progress, the remaining 33.33% expressed neutral views. This divergence suggests that officers may compartmentalize their endorsement of international service from its perceived domestic impacts. One Senior Patrol Officer articulated this distinction: โOur work abroad proves womenโs capabilities, but changing minds back home requires different battlesโ [PO-9]. This sentiment reflects the complex interplay between global visibility and local institutional change.[14]
Institutional vs. Societal Effects: Qualitative data revealed two distinct frameworks through which participants assessed gender progress:
Organizational Advancement: Tangible career opportunities arising from UN experience (e.g., promotions, specialized training)
Cultural Shifts: Broader societal acceptance of women in policing roles
Notably, officers frequently cited the former while expressing skepticism about the latter. A Deputy Superintendent observed: โThe force values our UN credentials, but my male colleagues still question whether mothers should patrol streetsโ [PO-2]. This dichotomy aligns with institutional theory perspectives on how external validation (e.g., through international assignments) may accelerate professional recognition faster than cultural norms evolve.[15]
Measurement Challenges: The neutral responses (55.56% across related questions) may reflect methodological limitations in capturing subtle attitudinal changes. As[16] notes, standardized metrics often overlook context-specific manifestations of progress. Participants described incremental changesโsuch as increased female recruitment or family support for deploymentsโthat the agree/neutral/disagree scale failed to differentiate.
Comparative Analysis: These findings contrast with studies documenting stronger perceived linkages between peacekeeping participation and gender equity in other national contexts.[17] The discrepancy may stem from Pakistanโs unique socio-legal environment, where recent legislative reforms (e.g., the 2017 National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security) coexist with persistent cultural barriers.[18]
Policy Implications: The non-significant association suggests that while UN deployments provide individual career benefits, their transformative potential on systemic gender dynamics may require complementary interventions. As[19] proposes, pre-deployment programs could better equip officers to translate international experiences into domestic advocacy, potentially strengthening the awareness-advancement connection.
The thematic analysis underscores that neutral responses often represented ambivalence rather than indifference. Many officers described observable progressโsuch as growing numbers of women in specialized unitsโwhile remaining cautious about declaring systemic change. This nuanced perspective highlights the importance of longitudinal research to track how international service influences gender norms over extended periods.[20]
Methodological Reflection: The lack of significant correlation may also reflect the studyโs focus on officer perceptions rather than objective indicators of gender progress. Future research could triangulate self-reported data with institutional metrics (e.g., promotion rates, harassment complaint resolutions) to provide a more comprehensive assessment of peacekeepingโs domestic impacts. Nevertheless, these findings contribute valuable insights into how frontline practitioners perceive the relationship between international service and local gender dynamics.
The analysis of responses concerning public safety perceptions and comfort levels with female officers revealed no statistically significant patterns. The chi-square test for Question 4, which assessed whether civilians feel safer interacting with women police officers, yielded , indicating no meaningful association between views on peacekeeping participation and this dimension of public trust. This non-significant finding contrasts with the strong consensus observed in other areas of the study.
As illustrated in Figure 1, responses to this question were evenly divided between agreement (44.44%) and neutral stances (55.56%), with no participants expressing disagreement. This distribution suggests ambivalence rather than opposition, possibly reflecting contextual factors specific to Pakistanโs policing environment. Qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into this phenomenon, with several officers noting that public comfort often depends on situational factors rather than generalized attitudes. One Assistant Sub-Inspector explained: โIn domestic violence cases, families request female officersโbut for traffic stops, some still prefer malesโ [PO-5]. This situational variability aligns withโ[21]s findings on the context-dependent nature of public preferences for officer gender.
The thematic analysis identified three key factors influencing these neutral responses:
Cultural Norms: Traditional gender roles affecting comfort levels in certain interactions
Operational Context: Type of policing activity (e.g., community engagement vs. law enforcement)
Visibility Effects: Public familiarity with female officers through media and local deployments
Notably, participants distinguished between the prestige of UN service and everyday policing realities. A Senior Patrol Officer observed: โAbroad, weโre seen as professionals firstโat home, gender still filters how people approach usโ [PO-8]. This dichotomy suggests that international deployments may not directly translate into enhanced domestic public trust, despite their diplomatic value.[22]
The lack of significant findings may also reflect methodological constraints. The questionโs phrasing (โDo you think women feel safer talking to female police officers?โ) potentially conflated two distinct conceptsโactual safety outcomes and perceived comfort levelsโwhich[23] identifies as separate dimensions of police-community relations. Future studies could benefit from disaggregating these constructs through more precise measurement tools.
Comparative analysis with regional studies reveals similar patterns. Research in neighboring countries has documented mixed public attitudes toward women in policing, with acceptance varying by demographic factors such as urban/rural residence and education levels.[24] This contextual complexity may explain why neutral responses predominated in our data, as officers likely encountered diverse public reactions across different communities.
The qualitative data nonetheless highlighted instances where female officers reported positive public engagement. Several participants described how their UN experience enhanced their ability to build trust: โAfter managing crowd control in [mission country], I developed techniques that work even with skeptical locals hereโ [PO-10]. Such accounts suggest that while statistical significance wasnโt achieved, meaningful interpersonal impacts may occur at the micro-level.
From a policy perspective, these findings underscore the need for targeted community engagement strategies alongside international deployments. As[25] recommends, public education campaigns demonstrating female officersโ competencies could help bridge the gap between their proven capabilities in peacekeeping and residual domestic skepticism. The studyโs neutral response pattern may thus represent a transitional phase in evolving public attitudes rather than entrenched resistance.
Methodologically, the limited number of responses to this particular question (N=5) warrants caution in interpretation. The small cell sizes in the chi-square analysis increase the risk of Type II errors, where genuine associations go undetected. This technical limitation points to the value of larger-scale follow-up studies specifically examining the intersection of peacekeeping service and domestic public trust dynamics.
The officersโ narratives revealed an important nuance: while statistical significance was absent at the aggregate level, individual stories demonstrated how UN experience could indirectly influence public perceptions. One Deputy Superintendent described mentoring local girlsโ groups upon returning from deployment: โThey see the UN medal and start imagining themselves in uniformโ [PO-4]. Such ripple effects, though not captured in the quantitative analysis, suggest that peacekeepingโs societal impacts may manifest through channels beyond immediate public comfort metrics.
These findings contribute to ongoing debates about how international policing experience translates into domestic legitimacy. While the results donโt support a direct relationship between peacekeeping participation and enhanced public comfort with female officers, they open avenues for investigating more complex mediation modelsโperhaps where institutional reforms or media representation serve as intervening variables.[26] The predominance of neutral responses particularly invites research into the conditions under which these attitudes might shift toward more definitive positions.
Examining the potential linkage between officersโ perspectives on women in peacekeeping and their personal career ambitions revealed no statistically significant association. The chi-square analysis for Question 5, which probed respondentsโ willingness to join the Pakistan Police and serve abroad again, yielded . This non-significant finding suggests that support for womenโs participation in UN missions operates independently from individual aspirations for continued international service.
The response distribution shown in Figure 1 demonstrates an even split between agreement (44.44%) and neutral positions (55.56%) regarding personal deployment aspirations. This pattern indicates that while officers overwhelmingly endorsed womenโs participation conceptually (85.71% agreement in Question 1), their personal decisions to pursue such opportunities involved additional considerations. A Senior Patrol Officer articulated this distinction: โI believe all qualified women should go, but after two missions, my family needs come firstโ [PO-11]. Such comments reflect the complex interplay between professional ideals and personal circumstances that shape career trajectories.[27]
Qualitative analysis uncovered three primary factors contributing to this disconnection between beliefs and intentions:
Family Obligations: Cultural expectations regarding womenโs domestic roles influencing deployment willingness
Career Timing: Strategic considerations about optimal points in oneโs career for international service
Post-Deployment Challenges: Reintegration difficulties affecting enthusiasm for subsequent missions
These findings align withโ[28]s framework on how gendered non-work factors differentially impact mobility decisions. Notably, several participants described how their UN experiencesโwhile professionally rewardingโintensified work-life balance pressures. One Assistant Sub-Inspector noted: โThe mission taught me incredible skills, but explaining a three-year gap in my childrenโs lives stays with meโ [PO-6].
The lack of statistical significance contrasts with studies documenting stronger links between peacekeeping service and career ambitions in other national contexts.[29] This discrepancy may stem from structural differences between military and police career pathways, with the latter often offering fewer institutionalized mechanisms for leveraging international experience. As[30] observes, the translation of peacekeeping credentials into domestic advancement varies substantially across law enforcement systems.
Methodologically, the neutral responses may reflect limitations in the questionโs binary framing (would/would not serve again). Several officers expressed conditional willingnessโfor instance, depending on mission location or family circumstancesโthat the agree/neutral/disagree scale failed to capture. This measurement issue underscoresโ[31]s caution about oversimplifying complex deployment decision-making processes.
Comparative analysis with regional studies reveals similar patterns. Research on Bangladeshi female peacekeepers found that while they strongly supported womenโs participation, many hesitated to redeploy due to childcare responsibilities.[32] This parallel suggests that the disconnection between professional beliefs and personal aspirations may reflect broader sociocultural dynamics in South Asian policing contexts.
The qualitative data nonetheless highlighted how UN service could indirectly influence career trajectories. Several participants described how their international experience reshaped their policing philosophy, even if they chose not to redeploy. One Deputy Superintendent reflected: โThe mission changed how I leadโnow I mentor junior female officers differentlyโ [PO-1]. Such transformative effects, while not reflected in the statistical analysis, indicate that peacekeepingโs professional impacts may manifest in ways beyond repeated deployments.
From a policy perspective, these findings suggest that increasing womenโs participation may require addressing structural barriers beyond attitudinal support. As[33] recommends, initiatives like family support programs or phased reentry protocols could help bridge the gap between officersโ endorsement of peacekeeping and their personal willingness to serve. The predominance of neutral responses particularly highlights the need for more flexible deployment options accommodating diverse life circumstances.
The studyโs limitations in this area include the small subsample (N=5) addressing redeployment intentions, which restricts the generalizability of findings. Additionally, the cross-sectional design couldnโt capture how aspirations might evolve over officersโ careers. Longitudinal research tracking female officers from recruitment through multiple deployment cycles could provide richer insights into these dynamics.[34]
Despite the non-significant quantitative results, the qualitative narratives revealed an important nuance: even officers expressing neutral positions about redeployment frequently described their UN service as career-defining. This paradox suggests that while statistical measures showed no association, experiential accounts demonstrated profound professional impacts. As one participant summarized: โOne mission was enough to change everythingโhow I police, how Iโm seen, even how I see myselfโ [PO-4].
These findings contribute to emerging literature on the gendered dimensions of international policing careers. While not supporting a direct relationship between peacekeeping views and redeployment intentions, the results highlight the need for more nuanced models that account for institutional, cultural, and personal factors shaping womenโs career decisions in security sectors.[35] The prevalence of neutral responses particularly underscores the value of qualitative approaches in capturing the complexities underlying seemingly straightforward survey answers.
The studyโs results reveal a striking dichotomy between strong consensus on core issues and nuanced diversity in secondary perceptions regarding Pakistani women police officersโ participation in UN peacekeeping missions. While 85.71% of respondents unequivocally supported womenโs involvement in such operationsโwith no dissenting voices recordedโthe distribution of opinions became markedly more varied when examining broader societal impacts. This pattern suggests that while the principle of female participation enjoys robust endorsement among serving officers, its perceived ripple effects on gender progress and public trust remain subjects of active negotiation rather than settled consensus.
The statistical findings align with qualitative narratives that framed peacekeeping participation as both a professional opportunity and a diplomatic imperative. As one Deputy Superintendent articulated: โOur presence in UN missions proves Pakistanโs commitment to global security and gender equality simultaneouslyโ [PO-3]. This dual framing emerged as a unifying theme across interviews, transcending rank and mission experience differences. However, the same officers frequently qualified their enthusiasm when discussing domestic implications, with many adopting measured positions on whether international service translated directly into local gender advancements or enhanced public comfort with female officers.
Three key dimensions of this consensus-diversity dynamic emerged from the integrated analysis:
Operational vs. Symbolic Value: Uniform agreement on womenโs capability to perform peacekeeping functions contrasted with divergent views on how such service influences societal attitudes
Temporal Perspectives: Immediate mission impacts (e.g., community engagement) garnered stronger consensus than long-term institutional changes
Locus of Effect: Clear perceptions of international image benefits coexisted with ambiguous assessments of domestic policing transformations
The response distribution shown in Figure 1 visually encapsulates this pattern, with the stacked bar chart demonstrating near-unanimity on participation questions (85.71% agree) versus more balanced agree/neutral splits for gender progress (66.67%/33.33%) and public trust (44.44%/55.56%) items. This graduated decline in consensus intensity suggests that support for womenโs peacekeeping roles operates on a continuumโmost solid when assessing concrete operational contributions, increasingly tentative when considering broader sociocultural ramifications.
Methodologically, the prevalence of neutral responses (55.56% for two key questions) presents both a challenge and an opportunity for interpretation. These responses rarely indicated indifference but rather reflected what one Assistant Sub-Inspector described as โcomplicated realitiesโ [PO-5]โsituations where officers observed partial progress but hesitated to declare systemic change. This nuanced positioning aligns withโ[36]s conceptualization of neutral survey responses as meaningful expressions of cognitive complexity rather than mere non-committal stances.
The studyโs mixed-methods design proved particularly valuable in unpacking these complexities. While quantitative analysis established the statistical contours of agreement and variation, qualitative data revealed the contextual factors shaping these patterns. For instance, several participants who selected โneutralโ on gender progress questions elaborated in interviews about witnessing both advancements (e.g., increased female recruitment) and persistent barriers (e.g., resistance to women in command roles). This duality underscores the importance of complementing Likert-scale measurements with narrative accounts to capture multidimensional attitudes.
Comparative analysis with regional studies suggests this consensus-diversity pattern may reflect broader transitional dynamics in South Asian policing. Research on Indian female officers similarly documents strong professional solidarity coexisting with varied perceptions of societal impact.[37] This parallel implies that while institutional spaces for women in security sectors are expanding across the region, the cultural translation of these changes follows more uneven trajectories.
The findings carry important implications for policy and practice. The robust consensus on participation supports initiatives to increase womenโs representation in peacekeeping, while the diversity in secondary perceptions highlights the need for targeted interventions addressing specific barriers to gender progress. As[38] argues, maximizing peacekeepingโs transformative potential requires moving beyond numerical representation to address the structural and cultural factors that shape how participation translates into broader change.
Several limitations qualify these conclusions. The purposive sampling strategy, while ensuring depth of experience, may have overrepresented officers with particularly positive views. Additionally, the studyโs focus on serving officers necessarily excludes perspectives from those who left the serviceโpotentially missing important counter-narratives. Future research could address these gaps through broader sampling frames and longitudinal designs tracking officersโ views across their careers.
The interplay between consensus and diversity in these findings ultimately paints a picture of a professional community in transitionโunited in its commitment to womenโs peacekeeping roles yet grappling with the complexities of realizing their full societal potential. As one Senior Patrol Officer reflected: โWeโve won the argument about whether we belong in UN missions. Now weโre working on what that means everywhere elseโ [PO-8]. This evolving perspective captures both the studyโs central findings and the ongoing nature of the processes it examines.
The results particularly underscore the value of distinguishing between different levels and types of consensus in gender and security research. While aggregate measures might suggest straightforward support for womenโs participation, disaggregated analysis reveals important variations that inform more nuanced policy approaches. This granular understanding proves essential for designing interventions that build on existing agreement while addressing areas of persistent ambiguity or contention.
By mapping both the convergences and divergences in officersโ perceptions, the study contributes to theoretical frameworks on gendered institutional change. The findings supportโ[39]s concept of โnested newness,โ where innovations (like women in peacekeeping) gain acceptance at different rates across institutional levels. The strong consensus on core participation questions reflects change at the operational level, while the diversity in societal impact perceptions indicates slower adaptation in broader cultural schemasโa pattern with implications for understanding gender integration processes across security sectors globally.
The findings of this study offer several important implications for both theory and practice in the context of gender-inclusive peacekeeping. The strong association between support for womenโs participation in UN missions and the perception of enhanced national image underscores the diplomatic value of female officers in peace operations. This aligns with existing literature on soft power projection,[40] suggesting that gender-diverse peacekeeping forces not only improve mission effectiveness but also serve as strategic tools for national branding. Policymakers in Pakistan and similar contexts could leverage these findings to advocate for increased female representation in peacekeeping, framing it as a means to strengthen international standing while advancing gender equality.
However, the lack of significant correlations regarding gender progress and public trust in female officers reveals a critical gap between institutional participation and societal transformation. This disconnect suggests that while womenโs involvement in peacekeeping may enhance Pakistanโs global image, its domestic impact remains constrained by entrenched cultural norms. Practitioners should consider complementary initiatives, such as community engagement programs that highlight the operational successes of female officers, to bridge this gap. For instance, integrating post-deployment debriefs into public awareness campaigns could help translate international achievements into local legitimacy.
The studyโs methodological limitations must also be acknowledged. The small sample size, though purposively selected for depth, restricts the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential response bias, as officers may have emphasized positive aspects of their experiences to align with perceived expectations. The use of a three-point Likert scale further limited the granularity of responses, potentially obscuring nuanced attitudes. Future research could address these constraints by employing larger, more diverse samples and incorporating mixed-methods approaches that triangulate survey data with observational or institutional records.
A particularly underexplored area is the long-term career trajectories of female peacekeepers. While this study captured immediate perceptions, longitudinal research could examine how UN service influences promotions, leadership opportunities, and retention rates within domestic policing institutions. Such investigations would benefit from comparative designs that contrast Pakistanโs experiences with those of other Muslim-majority nations participating in peacekeeping, such as Bangladesh or Indonesia. Additionally, future studies should explore the perspectives of male colleagues and community members to assess whether female officersโ peacekeeping roles shift broader attitudes toward women in law enforcement.
The neutral responses dominating questions on gender progress and public trust also point to the need for more context-sensitive measurement tools. Standardized surveys may fail to capture the incremental, localized changes that officers described qualitatively. Developing culturally adapted metricsโsuch as scales assessing community-specific comfort levels with female officersโcould yield more precise insights. This approach would align with recent calls for decolonizing peacekeeping research by centering local epistemologies.[41]
Finally, the studyโs findings invite reflection on the institutional mechanisms that facilitate or hinder the translation of peacekeeping experience into domestic gender progress. While UN deployments provide individual officers with advanced training and exposure, systemic change requires structural reforms within national police forces. Future research should examine how organizational policiesโsuch as mentorship programs or gender-sensitive promotion criteriaโmediate the relationship between international service and career advancement. Such investigations could inform evidence-based interventions that maximize the societal returns on investments in womenโs peacekeeping participation.
The nuanced perspectives uncovered in this study challenge binary narratives of either success or stagnation in gender-inclusive peacekeeping. Instead, they reveal a complex interplay between global visibility and local institutional change, where progress is evident but uneven. This complexity underscores the importance of sustained, multifaceted efforts to ensure that womenโs participation in peace operations translates into meaningful transformation both abroad and at home.
5 Conclusion
This study set out to examine the role of Pakistani women police officers in UN peacekeeping missions, focusing on their contributions to national image projection, gender dynamics, and societal perceptions. The findings demonstrate strong support for womenโs participation in peace operations, with a statistically significant association between their involvement and the enhancement of Pakistanโs soft power. However, the study also reveals a disconnect between international achievements and domestic perceptions, as evidenced by the lack of significant correlations regarding gender progress and public trust in female officers. These results contribute to the broader discourse on gender-inclusive security strategies by highlighting both the transformative potential and the contextual limitations of womenโs participation in peacekeeping. Looking ahead, future research should explore the long-term impacts of peacekeeping service on officersโ career trajectories and the mechanisms through which international experience influences domestic policing cultures. Comparative studies across different national contexts could further elucidate the sociocultural factors that shape the translation of global visibility into local institutional change. While this study provides empirical evidence for the diplomatic value of womenโs participation in UN missions, it also underscores the need for complementary interventions to address persistent gaps in societal acceptance. The findings ultimately call for a more nuanced understanding of how gender-inclusive peacekeeping can serve as a catalyst for both international reputation-building and domestic social progress.
[1] S Maus, United Nations Peace Operations and Human Rights: Normativity and Compliance (books.google.com, 2020).
[2] M Katayanagi, Human Rights Functions of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations (books.google.com, 2002).
[3] M Imran, G Murtiza, and MS Akbar, โPakistanโs Role in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations: An Analysis,โ J. Pol. Stud., 2023.
[4] K Mรฅnsson, โIntegration of Human Rights in Peace Operations: Is There an Ideal Model?โ Peace Operations and Human Rights, 2013.
[5] N Azimi, The Role and Functions of Civilian Police in United Nations Peace-Keeping Operations: Debriefing and Lessons (books.google.com, 2023).
[6] SU Shah, Pakistan and United Nations Peacekeeping: Experiences and Opportunities (isas.nus.edu.sg, 2020).
[7] S Islam, MI Mehmood, and MH Khan, โAnalysis of Pakistanโs Role in United Nations Peacekeeping Missions,โ Unable to Determine the Complete Publication Venue, 2022.
[8] R Thakur, โUsing a Framework to Evaluate Peace Operations: The Role of the United Nations,โ Journal of International Peacekeeping, 2012.
[9] T Qureshi, โNormative Framework of United Nations Peacekeeping Operation and Responsibility for the Violation of Human Rights by Peacekeeping Forces,โ 5th International Students Social Sciences Congress, 2019.
[10] AJ Bellamy and CT Hunt, โTwenty-First Century UN Peace Operations: Protection, Force and the Changing Security Environment,โ International Affairs, 2015.
[11] L Jaลกovรก, Gender Mainstreaming in UN Peacekeeping Operations (dspace.cuni.cz, 2022).
[12] S Karim and K Beardsley, Equal Opportunity Peacekeeping: Women, Peace, and Security in Post-Conflict States (books.google.com, 2017).
[13] M Van Hulst, โStorytelling at the Police Station: The Canteen Culture Revisited,โ British Journal of Criminology, 2013.
[14] L Bacon, โLiberiaโs Gender-Sensitive Police Reform: Improving Representation and Responsiveness in a Post-Conflict Setting,โ Development Assistance for Peacebuilding, 2017.
[16] CM Goulart et al., โTools for Measuring Gender Equality and Womenโs Empowerment (GEWE) Indicators in Humanitarian Settings,โ Conflict and Health, 2021.
[17] A Mackay, โTraining the Uniforms: Gender and Peacekeeping Operations,โ Development in Practice, 2003.
[18] N Shawki, โImplementing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda,โ Global Affairs, 2017.
[19] M Lyytikรคinen et al., Gender Training for Peacekeepers: Preliminary Overview of United Nations Peace Support Operations (peacewomen.org, 2007).
[20] S Whittington and M Litt, โPeace-Keeping Operations and Gender Equality in Post-Conflict Reconstruction,โ Eu – Lac Conference on the Role of Women, 2002.
[21] B Phillips and P Jenkins, โGender-Based Violence and Disasters: South Asia in Comparative Perspective,โ Women and Disasters in South Asia, 2016.
[22] AJ Ritchie, Invisible No More: Police Violence Against Black Women and Women of Color (books.google.com, 2017).
[23] FD Boateng, โRestoring the Lost Hope: A Multidimensional Approach for Building Public Trust in the Police,โ JIJIS, 2013.
[24] S Tripathi and S Azhar, โโNo One Blames Men in Our Societyโ: Indian Police Officersโ Perceptions of Female Complainants,โ The British Journal of Criminology, 2021.
[25] SB Perrott, โProgress Towards More Culturally and Gender-Sensitive Policing: Perceptions from a Canadian Sample of Police Officers,โ The Police Journal, 2018.
[26] T AIMEUR, Media Representation of Women in Their International Day: A Social Semiotic Analysis of Selected Algerian, American and British Newspapers (dspace.ummto.dz, 2017).
[27] DC Chu, โEmployment Motivation and Job-Related Satisfaction: A Comparison of Police Womenโs Perceptions in Dubai and Taipei,โ Policing and Society, 2018.
[28] X Salamin and D Hanappi, โWomen and International Assignments: A Systematic Literature Review Exploring Textual Data by Correspondence Analysis,โ Journal of Global Mobility, 2014.
[29] N Wilรฉn and L Heinecken, โPeacekeeping Deployment Abroad and the Self-Perceptions of the Effect on Career Advancement, Status and Reintegration,โ International Peacekeeping, 2017.
[30] ๊ฐ์ง์, Comparative Study on Police Recruitment System in Korea and China (dbpia.co.kr, 2020).
[31] S Rietjens and C Ruffa, โUnderstanding Coherence in UN Peacekeeping: A Conceptual Framework,โ International Peacekeeping, 2019.
[32] DS Nanglu, Challenges of Integration of Women in Peacekeeping Operations (publications.sto.nato.int, 2019).
[33] KP Coleman, โDownsizing in Un Peacekeeping: The Impact on Civilian Peacekeepers and the Missions Employing Them,โ International Peacekeeping, 2020.
[34] R Irving, โCareer Trajectories of Women in Policing in Australia.โ Trends & Issues in Crime & Criminal Justice, 2009.
[35] TOC Shelley, MS Morabito, et al., โGendered Institutions and Gender Roles: Understanding the Experiences of Women in Policing,โ Criminal Justice Studies, 2011.
[36] M Hรคnze, โAmbivalence, Conflict, and Decision Making: Attitudes and Feelings in Germany Towards NATOโs Military Intervention in the Kosovo War,โ European Journal of Social Psychology, 2001.
[37] RS Afroze, โModernization and Policing in South Asia: The Case of Bangladesh with Particular Reference to Women in Policing,โ Crime, Criminal Justice, And The Evolving Science Of Policing, 2017.
[38] E le Roux, โChallenging the Status Quo: The Role of Women in Peace Processes,โ Alternative Approaches in Conflict Resolution, 2025.
[39] S Blavoukos and D Bourantonis, โNested Institutions,โ Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, 2016.
[40] S Malik, โFostering Inclusivity in Peacekeeping: Challenging Gender Stereotypes, Navigating Cultural Understanding, and Promoting Diversity in Recruitment,โ Flux: International Relations Review, 2024.
[41] B Magalhรฃes Teixeira, โThe Global South as a Theoretical and Methodological Marker for Scientific Inquiry: Researching and Teaching Decolonial Peace,โ Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 2025.
Imagine you are trying to fix a broken car engine. You have a manual, but it was written for a different model, in a different country, with different roads. You follow the instructions carefully. You tighten the bolts. You change the oil. But the car still will not start.
The problem is not your effort. The problem is the manual.
In 2026, the world is facing complex engines: climate change, artificial intelligence, shifting borders, and economic instability. Yet, most of the manuals we use to understand these problems were written decades ago, in capital cities far away from where the problems are felt most deeply.
This is why Presser Review exists. This is why our tagline is Media & World Affairs Beyond Western Frames. It is not about rejecting knowledge from Europe or North America. It is about realizing that their manual does not fit our car. And if we want the engine to run, we need to write a new one together.
What Is a “Frame”?
Let us simplify this. Imagine you are taking a photograph of a busy street in Lahore. You look through your camera viewfinder. You see a vendor selling fruit. You see a traffic jam. You see a child walking to school.
You press the button.
Now, imagine someone else takes a photo of the same street from a helicopter. They see the flow of traffic. They see the density of the buildings. They do not see the sweat on the vendor’s face. They do not hear the child laughing.
Both photos are real. Both photos are true. But neither photo is the whole story.
A “frame” is like that camera angle. It is the lens through which we view the world. For the last hundred years, most major news agencies, universities, and policy think tanks have used a specific lens. We call this the “Western Frame.” It prioritizes certain questions: How does this affect global markets? How does this impact security alliances? What do the official statistics say?
These are important questions. But they often miss others: How does this affect the farmer’s livelihood? What does local history tell us about this conflict? What do the community elders say?
When we rely on only one frame, we get a flat picture. We see the shape of the problem, but we miss its texture.
Why 2026 Is Different
Ten years ago, you could argue that one perspective was enough. The world was simpler. Power was concentrated. Information moved slowly.
Today, in 2026, that is no longer true.
First, the world is multipolar. Power is not held by just one or two nations. Decisions made in Beijing, Islamabad, Brasรญlia, or Lagos ripple across the globe just as much as those made in Washington or London. If we only listen to one side of the room, we will misunderstand the conversation.
Second, our challenges are local and global at the same time. Take climate change. A report in Geneva might tell us that global temperatures rose by 1.5 degrees. That is a number. But in Punjab, that number means wheat harvests are failing. In Karachi, it means heavier monsoon floods. In the north, it means glaciers are melting faster. The global number is useful, but it does not tell a Pakistani family how to survive the next season. We need analysis that connects the global data to the local reality.
Third, technology has changed who can speak. In the past, you needed a printing press or a TV station to share ideas. Today, a student in a university library can access data that was once secret. A community worker can record video evidence of environmental damage. The tools of knowledge are no longer locked away. Yet, the interpretation of that knowledge is still controlled by a few large outlets.
What We Lose When We Stick to One View
Why does this matter? Why not just accept the mainstream stories?
Because when the frame is wrong, the solutions are wrong.
Consider security. For years, many analysts looked at border conflicts only through the lens of military strength. They counted tanks and troops. But they missed the social fabric. They missed how water scarcity drives young men to join militias. They missed how trade routes affect local loyalty. As a result, policies were made that stopped the fighting for a month, but made the peace impossible for a decade.
Consider media. When a crisis happens in the Global South, mainstream coverage often focuses on disaster, poverty, or conflict. It rarely focuses on innovation, resilience, or complex history. This creates a stereotype. It tells the world that these regions are problems to be solved, rather than partners with solutions. This affects investment. It affects tourism. It affects how young people in these countries see themselves.
When we limit our frames, we limit our imagination. We stop seeing possible futures because we are too busy analyzing the past through someone else’s eyes.
The Presser Review Promise
So, what does Presser Review offer instead?
We are not here to shout down other voices. We are here to add volume to the ones that are too quiet.
1. We Prioritize Context Over Sensation. News cycles move fast. They want headlines that shock. We want analysis that sticks. When a event happens, we will not just ask “What happened?” We will ask “Why does this matter here? What happened before? What might happen next?”
2. We Value Local Knowledge as Expertise. A farmer who has watched the rain patterns for forty years knows something a satellite model does not. A teacher in a public school knows something about youth radicalization that a security report might miss. We treat this knowledge as data, not just anecdotes.
3. We Write for Humans, Not Just Academics. Scholarship is important. But if only ten people can understand it, its value is limited. We believe that deep ideas should be written in clear language. You should not need a PhD to understand global affairs. You just need curiosity.
4. We Are Open Access. Knowledge should not be locked behind paywalls. If a student in Quetta cannot afford to read a report, the report has failed. All our content will be free to read, free to share, and free to learn from.
Joining the Conversation
This journal is not just a website. It is a workshop.
We invite students, researchers, journalists, and curious citizens to contribute. We do not need you to write like a professor. We need you to think like one. We need your questions. We need your data. We need your stories.
In 2026, the world does not need more noise. It needs more clarity. It does not need more of the same old maps. It needs new ones.
Presser Review is our attempt to draw that new map. It will not be perfect. But it will be honest. It will be rigorous. And it will be ours.
